The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 40, January 1901)

This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

Title: The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 40, January 1901)

Author: Pennsylvania Prison Society

Release date: April 2, 2018 [eBook #56904]

Language: English

Credits: Produced by Larry B. Harrison, Wayne Hammond and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This

book was produced from images made available by the

HathiTrust Digital Library.)

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE JOURNAL OF PRISON DISCIPLINE AND PHILANTHROPY (NEW SERIES, NO. 40, JANUARY 1901) ***

NEW SERIES NUMBER 40

THE JOURNAL

OF

PRISON DISCIPLINE

AND

PHILANTHROPY

PUBLISHED ANNUALLY

UNDER THE DIRECTION OF “THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY.”

INSTITUTED MAY 8th, 1787.

JANUARY, 1901.

OFFICE: STATE HOUSE ROW

S. W. CORNER FIFTH AND CHESTNUT STREETS

PHILADELPHIA, PA.

CONSTITUTION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY.

When we consider that the obligations of benevolence, which are founded on the precept and examples of the Author of Christianity, are not cancelled by the follies or crimes of our fellow-creatures, and when we reflect upon the miseries, which penury, hunger, cold, unnecessary severity, unwholesome apartments, and guilt (the usual attendants of prisons) involve with them, it becomes us to extend our compassion to that part of mankind who are the subjects of those miseries. By the aid of humanity their undue and illegal sufferings may be prevented; the link which should bind the whole family of mankind together, under all circumstances, be preserved unbroken; and such degree and modes of punishment may be discovered and suggested as may, instead of continuing habits of vice, become the means of restoring our fellow-creatures to virtue and happiness. From a conviction of the truth and obligations of these principles, the subscribers have associated themselves under the title of “THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY.”

For effecting these purposes they have adopted the following CONSTITUTION:

ARTICLE I.

The officers of the Society shall consist of a President, two Vice-Presidents, two Secretaries, a Treasurer, who may be an undoubted first-class Trust and Safe Deposit Company, regularly chartered by the State or national authorities; two Counsellors, and an Acting Committee; all of whom shall first be nominated as suitable by the “Committee on Membership in the Acting Committee,” a standing committee of that body. They shall be chosen by ballot at the annual meeting of the Society to be held on the fourth Thursday in the First month (January) of each year, and shall continue in office until their successors are elected.

No person shall be placed in nomination for officers of the Society, or as a member of the Acting Committee who shall not have been previously appointed by a standing committee of the Acting Committee called “The Committee on Membership in the Acting Committee.” A majority of the whole number of votes cast shall be required to elect any nominee.

In case an election for any cause shall not then be held, it shall be the duty of the President to call a special meeting of the Society, within thirty days, for the purpose of holding such election, of which at least three days’ notice shall be given.

ARTICLE II.

The President shall preside in all Meetings, and subscribe all public acts of the Society. He may call special meetings whenever he may deem it expedient, and shall do so when requested in writing by five members. In his absence one of the Vice-Presidents may act in his place.

ARTICLE III.

The Secretaries shall keep fair records of the proceedings of the Society, and shall conduct its correspondence.

ARTICLE IV.

The Treasurer shall keep the moneys and securities, and pay all orders of the Society, or of the Acting Committee signed by the presiding officer and the Secretary, and shall present a statement of the receipts and expenditures at each stated meeting of the Society, and an Annual Report at the annual meeting in the First month (January).

All investments and re-investments shall be made by the Treasurer only with the advice and consent of a majority of the members of the Finance Committee of the Acting Committee.

All bequests and life subscriptions shall be safely invested, only the income thereof to be applied to the current expenses of the Society.

[CONTINUED ON THIRD PAGE OF COVER.]

OFFICE OF THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY, Fifth and Chestnut Sts., Philadelphia.

NEW SERIES NUMBER 40

THE JOURNAL

OF

PRISON DISCIPLINE

AND

PHILANTHROPY

PUBLISHED ANNUALLY

UNDER THE DIRECTION OF “THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY.”

INSTITUTED MAY 8TH, 1787.

JANUARY, 1901.

OFFICE: STATE HOUSE ROW

S. W. CORNER FIFTH AND CHESTNUT STREETS

PHILADELPHIA, PA.

THE

PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY

(FORMERLY CALLED THE PHILADELPHIA SOCIETY FOR ALLEVIATING

THE MISERIES OF PUBLIC PRISONS.)

Place of Meeting, State House Row, Philadelphia.

S. W. Cor. Fifth and Chestnut Sts.

At the 114th Annual Meeting of “THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY,” held on the evening of the First month (January) 24th, 1901, the Editorial Board (appointed to take charge of the Journal and papers and the Annual Report), consisting of REV. R. HEBER BARNES, CHARLES M. MORTON, JOHN J. LYTLE, REV. H. CRESSON MCHENRY and REV. GEORGE A. LATIMER, presented the draft of the Annual Report.

The Society directed the Editorial Board to print 5000 copies, and to make such alterations and additions as they thought proper.

The report to be signed by the President and Secretary.

JOHN J. LYTLE, Secretary.

Editorial Board for 1901: REV. R. HEBER BARNES, Chairman; CHARLES M. MORTON, JOHN J. LYTLE, REV. H. CRESSON MCHENRY, REV. GEORGE A. LATIMER.

Persons receiving the Journal are invited to correspond with, and send any publications on Prison and Prison Discipline, and articles for the Journal, to the Chairman of the Editorial Board, 600 North Thirty-second Street, Philadelphia, Pa., or to the General Secretary, Philadelphia, S. W. cor. Fifth and Chestnut Streets.

👉 JOHN J. LYTLE, Office S. W. cor. Fifth and Chestnut Streets, Philadelphia, is the General Secretary of the Society, giving especial attention to the Eastern Penitentiary.

👉 J. J. CAMP, Agent for County Prison, appointed by the Inspectors, acts under their direction, and aids the Prison Society.

👉 FREDERICK J. POOLEY is Agent for the County Prison, appointed by the Prison Society.

OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY FOR 1901.

President:

CALEB J. MILNE.

Vice Presidents:

REV. HERMAN L. DUHRING, D.D., GEORGE W. HALL.

Treasurer:

CHARLES M. MORTON.

Secretaries:

JOHN J. LYTLE, FREDERICK J. POOLEY.

Counselors:

HON. WM. N. ASHMAN, HENRY S. CATTELL.

Members of the Acting Committee:

William Ingram,

Rev. William S. Neill,

Rev. Joseph Welch,

Leonard N. Walker,

William T. W. Jester,

Joseph C. Noblit,

P. H. Spellissy,

Deborah C. Leeds,

Miss C. V. Hodges,

John H. Dillingham,

Rev. Robert W. Forsyth,

Joseph Hill Brinton,

John Woolman,

George Guest Williams,

Rebecca P. Latimer,

Dr. Emily J. Ingram,

Thomas B. Watson,

Rev. Floyd W. Tomkins,

Wm. Scattergood,

Mrs. Horace Fassett,

Rev. Wm. T. S. Lumbar,

Mrs. P. W. Lawrence,

Rev. H. Cresson McHenry,

Randolph H. Chappel,

Mary S. Whelen,

Esther Strawbridge,

Rev. Michael Zara,

Isaac Slack,

William F. Overman,

William F. Schwartz,

William Koelle,

Rev. John Moncure,

Charles F. Cripps,

Rev. R. Heber Barnes,

J. Albert Koons,

Harry Kennedy,

Rev. Geo. A. Latimer,

Lindley H. Bedell,

Catharine M. Shipley,

Dr. Wm. C. Stokes,

Samuel L. Whitson,

Layyah A. Barakat,

J. Henry Bartlett,

George R. Meloney,

Rev. J. F. Ohl,

Rev. Joseph J. Camp,

Walter Crossing,

William E. Tatum.

Visiting Committee, the Eastern State Penitentiary:

Charles M. Morton,

Rev. Robert W. Forsyth,

Joseph Hill Brinton,

Rev. H. L. Duhring,

George Guest Williams,

Rebecca P. Latimer,

John J. Lytle,

Thomas B. Watson,

Rev. Floyd W. Tomkins,

Leonard N. Walker,

Mrs. Horace Fassett,

Rev. Wm. T. S. Lumbar,

P. H. Spellissy,

Rev. H. Cresson McHenry,

Randolph H. Chappel,

John H. Dillingham,

Esther Strawbridge,

Rev. Michael Zara,

Mary S. Whelen,

William F. Overman,

William F. Schwartz,

Isaac Slack,

J. Albert Koons,

Charles F. Cripps,

William Koelle,

Lindley H. Bedell,

Harry Kennedy,

Rev. R. Heber Barnes,

Samuel L. Whitson,

Catharine M. Shipley,

Rev. Geo. A. Latimer,

George R. Meloney,

Layyah A. Barakat,

Dr. Wm. C. Stokes,

Walter Crossing,

Rev. J. F. Ohl,

J. Henry Bartlett,

Rev. Joseph Welch,

Rev. William S. Neill,

William T. W. Jester,

Joseph C. Noblit,

William E. Tatum.

Visiting Committee, the Philadelphia County Prisons:

George W. Hall,

Mary S. Whelen,

Mrs. Horace Fassett,

William Ingram,

Frederick J. Pooley,

Rev. John Moncure,

John Woolman,

Rev. Joseph J. Camp,

Miss C. V. Hodges,

Mrs. P. W. Lawrence,

Rev. William S. Neill,

Catharine M. Shipley,

P. H. Spellissy,

William T. W. Jester,

Layyah A. Barakat.

Deborah C. Leeds,

COMMITTEES OF THE SOCIETY FOR 1901.

Visiting Committee to Chester County Prison.

WILLIAM SCATTERGOOD.

Visiting Committee to Delaware County Prison, and the Counties of the

State at Large.

DEBORAH C. LEEDS.

Visiting Committee, the House of Correction.

LINDLEY H. BEDELL,

MARY S. WHELEN,

WM. T. W. JESTER,

REV. WM. S. NEILL,

DEBORAH C. LEEDS,

JOHN WOOLMAN,

REV. JOHN MONCURE,

REV. H. CRESSON McHENRY,

CATHARINE M. SHIPLEY,

LAYYAH A. BARAKAT.

STANDING COMMITTEES.

Library.

LINDLEY H. BEDELL, FREDERICK J. POOLEY,

WILLIAM INGRAM.

Accounts.

JOSEPH C. NOBLIT, WILLIAM F. OVERMAN,

THOMAS B. WATSON.

Membership in the Acting Committee.

JOHN J. LYTLE,

DR. WM. C. STOKES,

GEORGE W. HALL,

J. HENRY BARTLETT,

REV. H. CRESSON McHENRY.

Finance.

REV. R. HEBER BARNES,

JOHN J. LYTLE,

CHARLES M. MORTON,

GEORGE W. HALL,

LINDLEY H. BEDELL.

Memorials of Deceased Members.

REV. GEORGE A. LATIMER, REV. JOHN MONCURE.

Aid and Employment of Discharged Prisoners.

ISAAC SLACK,

REV. HERMAN L. DUHRING,

REV. JOSEPH WELCH,

WILLIAM KOELLE,

CHARLES F. CRIPPS, F. J. POOLEY,

MRS. P. W. LAWRENCE,

MRS. HORACE FASSETT,

REV. WM. S. NEILL,

MISS C. V. HODGES.

Police Matrons at Station Houses.

DR. EMILY J. INGRAM, MARY S. WHELEN,

MRS. P. W. LAWRENCE.

Editorial, of the Journal.

REV. R. HEBER BARNES,

JOHN J. LYTLE,

CHARLES M. MORTON,

REV. H. CRESSON McHENRY,

REV.GEO. A. LATIMER.

Auditing Committee.

REV. R. HEBER BARNES, LINDLEY H. BEDELL,

GEORGE W. HALL.

TABLE OF CONTENTS.

PAGE

Twentieth Century View of the Public Mind

7

Reformation of Prisoners; Change of Sentiment

7

The Eastern State Penitentiary

8

Parole and Indeterminate Sentence

8

Acting Committee Work; Official Visitors

9

Prison Agent; Care of Discharged Prisoners

9

Philadelphia County Prison, Moyamensing

10

“““ Woman’s Ward and Work

11

“““ Annex, Holmesburg Junction

11

House of Correction, Holmesburg Junction

12

Juvenile Offenders, and this City’s Cost of Crime

13

Police Matrons; Needs of a Woman’s Reformatory

14

REPORT OF GENERAL SECRETARY.

General Work and Observation

15

Correspondence and Work of the Acting Committee

16

The Eastern State Penitentiary, Relief of the Discharged

17

Silent Teachers; Cases of Interest

18

The Officers

20

Philadelphia County Prison and Annex

20

Some Cases of Interest

21

Chester County Prison, Delaware County Prison, and others

22

Statistics of Visitations to Prisoners

22

Police Matrons

23

In Memoriam, Henry M. Laing, late Treasurer

24

GATHERED FROM REPORTS AND OTHER SOURCES.

Change of Treatment Urged—State N. Y.

25

State Prison Dilemma

27

How to Deal With Wicked Men

27

Where Death Penalty is Needed

28

The Lock-Step

28

Grading and Classifying of Prisoners

29

Reclaimed Criminals by Parole Laws

29

Proposed Marriage Reform

30

Contract; Price-Piece; State Account

31

Convict Labor on State Farms

31

Road Making for Convicts

31

Industrial Reformatories

32

Massachusetts State Reformatory, Concord

32

Illinois State Reformatory, Pontiac

33

The Juvenile Court of Chicago

33

Sloyd Work; Novel Punishment

34

The Whipping-Post

34

The Bertillon System

35

Results of Treatment of the Insane

36

Havana Prisons, Cuba

37

Australian Prison Reform

38

Prisons in Old Paris

38

Model French Prison

39

Siberian Banishment

39

Norway Prison

40

REPORT OF THE NATIONAL PRISON CONGRESS.

Address of Welcome, Governor George K. Nash

41

M. W. Beacom, Welcome from Mayor, John H. Farley

42

Response by Hon. Frederick H. Wines, LL.D.

42

Address, Captain Edward S. Wright, President of the Congress

43

Annual Sermon, Rev. Ward Beecher Pickard, D.D.

44

Annual Address, Albert Garvin, President of the Association

45

Joseph F, Scott, “Civil Service in Prison”

46

Address, Chaplain Wm. J. Batt, Concord, Mass.

47

Address, Chaplain Wm. A. Locke, “Prison Methods”

47

Address, Chaplain D. R. Imbrie, “Decade of Prison Reform”

48

Hon. F. H. Wines on Dr. McKim’s Book

48

Chaplain J. F. Orwick on Prison Sunday

49

Oren C. Painter on Prisoners’ Aid Association, Baltimore

49

Address, Hon. Samuel J. Barrows, “International Congress”

49

Address, Hon. C. V. Collins, N. Y., “Education Among Criminals”

51

Address, Prof. Chas. R. Henderson, “Sociological Side of Reform”

52

Judge Martin Dewey Follett, “Criminal Law Reform”

53

George Torrance, “Preventative and Reformatory Work”

53

Dr. H. E. Allison, N. Y., “Preventative Heredity of Crime”

55

Captain C. S. Tremby, U. S. N., “Discipline in the Spanish War”

55

Mrs. F. A. Morton, Mass., “Elementary Practice in Education”

55

Address, Rev. August Drahms (Cal.), “Crime in Civilized Countries”

56

Hon. F. H. Wines, LL.D., Washington, D.C., “The U.S. Census”

56

Place of Next Congress Meeting and Entertainment

56

Address, José F. Godoy, Sec’y Mexican Embassy, Washington, D.C.

57

Address, Hon. Eugene Smith, N. Y. City, “The Cost of Crime”

57

Joseph F. Scott, Mass., “The Indeterminate Sentence”

59

Testimonial to Z. R. Brockway, late of Elmira Reformatory

59

Address, J. Warren Meade, Auburn, N. Y., “Prison Discipline”

59

Memorial Tribute to Three Departed Members

60

Wm. Chamberlain, Mich., “Discipline in State Penitentiary”

60

J. Warren Baily, Mass., “Discharged Prisoners”

60

Amos W. Butler, Indiana “State Parole”

61

Prof. R. G. Henderson, Chicago, “Psychological Laboratory”

61

Mrs. D. C. Leeds, Phila., “Woman’s Prison or Reformatory”

62

Complimentary Resolutions; Closing Remarks

62

JOURNAL OF PRISON DISCIPLINE

ONE HUNDRED AND FOURTEENTH

ANNUAL REPORT

1787. OF 1901.

“THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY.”

In the beginning of this Twentieth Century the public mind seems to have given more thought to the reformation of the prisoner, and his care after he goes out, rather than to the security of bolts and bars to hold him for the limited time. The march of progress is to treat him more like a man capable of being partially educated and taught some craft that he may follow when the sentence is ended or when paroled.

To this end, the statute law of our Commonwealth allowing only a small per centage of convicts to be employed, has been a drawback to progress, until all the Boards of Inspectors and Wardens (influenced by public opinion) have had the courage to use their better judgment. Convicts in our penitentiaries should, if physically able, be required to labor, both on the grounds of health, and of sound public policy, and such labor should as far as practicable, be such as will aid in paying the entire cost of their keeping. Military discipline and prison discipline—and still more, prison science—are essentially unlike, for one deals with men in the mass, while the other individualizes to the finest possible point.

Thirty-five years ago there was almost a complete indifference in the public mind concerning the reformation of prisoners, but now, the progress of the times seems to be fast changing sentiment, and leading onward to the requirements of a stated law making our penitentiaries more of a reformatory nature; prisoners classified, merit of grades, and employment in manual work for health. No doubt many of our prisons and county jails would require inexpensive additional buildings for reformatory plans; this would give work for many of the convicts under proper direction. It may be said that at the Eastern Penitentiary there is no room for additional buildings; but where there is a will, a way is generally found, though the space might be a little cramped and exclude a part of the current of air over the roofs of the present plant.

THE EASTERN PENITENTIARY has at this date, January 1st, 1,115 prisoners in 750 cells, which cells are intended for one prisoner each. So we see how our long-cherished cellular or separate system of Pennsylvania (still on the statute book) is fast passing into the congregate, though all foreign countries are even now following our former plan as the best.

Our prison Wardens, Chaplains, and Official Visitors by their oft personal visitations in the cells, have done faithful work endeavoring to reform the morals of the men, but after all, only a small percentage can be determined as really reformed from crooked ways, for many return a second or more times. Much of the kindly suggestions and godly teachings are lost to the official visitor by having to address two or more in a cell at one time, at the Eastern Penitentiary. Therefore, the sooner we arrive at the introduction of the Reformatory System, (known as such) and applied to all our penal institutions, the more hopeful for all our charges and benefit to the community in general.

The Reformatory System has four main principles as established in Massachusetts. 1st. Classification and advancement by merit. 2nd. Education and Sloyd work. 3rd. Trades and manual training. 4th. Parole and care of those discharged.

This State has not yet introduced a Parole System, though such a law has twice been passed by the Legislature and vetoed by different Governors. At the beginning of this century, the bill appears for the third time, but it is not intended to affect those now in custody.

An Indeterminate sentence law is still a future possibility of the new century. At the last National Prison Congress of Wardens and State Delegates held at Cleveland, Ohio, Sept. 1900, the Indeterminate Sentence System, was unanimously recommended.

The Official State delegates of this Prison Society present at that Congress were, Mrs. Deborah C. Leeds, John J. Lytle, and Rev. R. Heber Barnes, whose report will be found further on.

The matter of a House of Detention, for our first-class cities, juvenile prisoners between 8 and 16 years, has made but little progress, and it still awaits consent to appropriate one of our unused school-houses for that purpose.

The inequality of sentences often come to the knowledge of the Acting or Visiting Committee, both at the Penitentiary and the County Prison; and we often wonder that our Judges do not adopt some uniform length of sentences, especially for first imprisonments for minor offences.

The Acting Committee of 50 of this Society, and who are official visitors to the Eastern Penitentiary and County Prison and annex, have been untiring in their efforts to reform those whom they have visited in their cells. The monthly reports show that members of the Visiting Committee have made the past year 731 visits to prisoners at the Eastern Penitentiary on 15,616 prisoners, and at the County Prison and Convict Dept. Holmesburg, 848 visits to 6,191 prisoners.

Our female members visit the female prisoners in both institutions. Kind-hearted willing souls are found among the subscribers of our Society, who are willing to freely give and have spent their time and money for the recovery of those who have stumbled and fallen. What we need most is a classification of prisoners, that all may be employed in some work, and a merit system. The nearest approach to a merit system now is a shortened term or commutation for good behavior, and every man receives his pardon from the Governor which restores him to citizenship.

Eastern Penitentiary Board of Inspectors have done wisely in the sanitary improvements of the institution the past year, under the direction of our esteemed warden, D. W. Bussinger. The place once so cold and cheerless, has been brightened up and made scrupulously clean, and the foul draughts of air are no more. The fronts of out-buildings have been rebuilt and present an appearance of firmness and stability. The cells are kept neat and clean, and the food is much better, being in a larger variety, and by careful economy, at no greater cost. When you reach a man’s stomach with good things, it seems to brighten up his countenance; every visitor realizes this. The men have daily exercise in the yard, for health; and an instrumental band has been formed of those in the bakery department, and allowed in the rotunda two evenings in a month to entertain the entire population of the institution; they have become very creditable performers.

Our Prison Agent, John J. Lytle, is at the Penitentiary nearly every day of the year, and in advance of a man’s going out, provides through this Society what the State does not, a new suit of clothing when needed, and procures a railroad ticket if he is to go to some distant home, and then when the man has a place to work (if a trade), he provides tools and a suitable boarding-place until the man is able to do for himself. After a time he may have fallen, or met with misfortune, and again he comes for help that he may again be placed in position where he can earn a support; in all these cases the prisoner is identified by his prison number, which no man ever forgets. In order to carry on this work for the discharged prisoners, the income from the funds of the Society is but a third of what is needed; and as the Legislature and Governors have failed the past six years to grant the Society the accustomed $3000 annually, we have been compelled to solicit donations from benevolent donors for the discharged prisoners of the Eastern Penitentiary. The aid given for the discharged prisoners of the County Prison, is from the income of the Society.

It seems hardly just that we be compelled to solicit for discharged prisoners of the Eastern Penitentiary from Philadelphians, when many of the convicts are sent there from most of the eastern counties.

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON, MOYAMENSING.—A recent personal inspection of every nook and corner of this old prison (erected 1835) revealed the fact, that under the present Board of Inspectors, with generous modern ideas for alterations and improvements, it might truly be called an up-to-date city prison; scrupulously clean and in order everywhere, inside and out. Our highly esteemed Superintendent, Robert C. Motherwell, Jr., shows his especial adaptation to the work; for during the past year 45,688 persons passed in and out under his eye, about 3,800 per month; of these the received were white males, 17,788; white females, 1,889; black males, 2,508; black females 653. Total, 22,835; of these 532 were boys under sixteen years old. Total discharged, 22,853. This large number of juveniles, caused the remark of a keeper, that if he had to choose between the care of 12 boys or 500 men, he would prefer the latter. These boys are never placed in a felon’s cell, but in a portion especially assigned them, and are always apart from the other older prisoners.

All the repairs or alterations are done by the convicts, and many are employed in the shops. There is now a first-class steam-heating arrangement, and electric plant with sufficient voltage for an electrocution-chair in place of the gallows, if the State so directed. In connection with this, is a Kenyun steam disinfectant apparatus (the latest and most approved device) for the renovation of clothing, mattresses, and bedding from vermin, microbes, and possible contagion; treating it by high pressure of steam then by vacuum.

The officers of the Moyamensing prison are all well tried conscientious men, and have a very promiscuous lot of people to deal with. There is a very good library of 2,700 volumes, used by all the male departments, besides other reading matter is furnished. The cleanliness and hygienic atmosphere of all the corridors and cells could not pass unnoticed. Three religious services are held in this prison every Sunday, and excellent volunteer choirs contribute, which are greatly appreciated.

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON,

Moyamensing.

Rev. Joseph J. Camp, the highly-esteemed Prison Agent of the Inspectors for the past sixteen years, interviews many prisoners brought in, and often goes to court when the case comes up for trial.

Mr. Frederick J. Pooley, our meritorious Prison Agent of the Pennsylvania Prison Society, is doing good work and assists the Rev. Jos. J. Camp. He has to do principally with those minor cases which are discharged with short detention and without trial, by order of the magistrates.

The Acting or Visiting Committee of this Society appointed to the County Prison, have done good work in aiding reform of both men and women; often have helped to shed that ray of light into the heart of some suffering one, by kindly advice and good reading matter; some have even taken pains to look after many women on their discharge, keeping in touch with their better interests long after.

The Woman’s Ward, under the care of Miss Anna B. Harshaw, matron, impresses you as one whose genial disposition and good judgment, well prepares her for the care of her charges. During the past year there were received 1,889 white women and 653 black; average, 212 per month. On January 1st, there remained 62 convicts and 33 awaiting trial. The entire building is clean and neat, even the cells, the kitchen, storeroom, and laundry: here twenty women are daily at work, (do the work by hand) for the whole institution, a number are employed in making up and repair of clothing, for the men also. They have a good library and other reading matter, and are often visited by the ladies of the Acting Committee.

COUNTY PRISON CONVICT DEPARTMENT, HOLMESBURG JUNC., Under the efficient care of Capt. Charles A. Abel, Deputy Superintendent, a recently constructed plant, to which are sent all the convicts of the county’s charge, the number at present being about 450.

They have various kinds of trades work (limited of course). This institution is the same as all the penal institutions of the State, save one, lacks two things:—classification or grades, and manual work for all the convicts. There is a large choir of colored men, who, on Sunday afternoons, in the rotunda afford, pleasure for the rest of the institution, as part of the religious exercises. In all these departments of the County Prison, Sunday religious exercises are provided, and often good volunteer choirs, under the direction of the management.

The County Prison’s daily charge is little more than eleven hundred.

AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, January, 1901, George W. Hall, our high esteemed Treasurer for the past ____ years, tendered his resignation, and was unwilling to be re-elected to that office on account of recent sorrow and apparent failing health, desiring to be relieved from some of the responsible active duties and cares of this life. We appreciate his good judgment, and a Trust Company was appointed until the annual meeting when Charles M. Morton was elected to fill this office; unwilling to part with our faithful officer, he was elected one of its Vice-Presidents.

HOUSE OF CORRECTION, at Holmesburg Junction, usually has about 800 inmates, and consists of those sent there for drunkenness or for minor offences committed through intoxication. Most of these are compelled to work; a large number in the stone quarry, facing stone, and breaking for road-dressing, different sizes are sifted by hand labor. On Sunday all are required to be at chapel service and they have many reasonable privileges. It is a very well conducted institution in which this Society takes an interest; but the majority, on being dismissed immediately return to their dissipated habits and are often recommitted. Heretofore these prisoners were taken from the lower part of the city, on police tugboats to the House of Correction wharf, but in consequence of the Act of Congress recently going into effect, some other plan is devised until the boats are modified. The new law requires that the boats shall carry a sufficient number of lifeboats in proportion to the number of prisoners, and as the tugboats are only equipped with one yawl they cannot be used for this work until the necessary changes are made.

JUVENILE OFFENDERS. Judge Audenried believes in a sound spanking, as a more beneficial punishment than imprisonment, when a lad first shows inclination towards evil, and many times rather than send a boy to the House of Refuge, he has allowed him to go upon the parents promising no longer to spare the rod.

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON,

Convict Department, Holmesburg Junction.

A matter of great importance to our Commonwealth, to cite a case—a girl of fourteen years was recently convicted of petty larceny, sentenced to prison for three months. Appeal for mercy, on the ground of first offence, did not avail. But to jail, to be influenced for a worse career, instead of a reformative effect. The courts could not be held accountable for this state of affairs. Indeed it would be hard to find anywhere a more conscientious and just judge than Judge Biddle, before whom the case came. Our Judges are not lawmakers, and must interpret the law as it exists, and follow the statutory provisions enacted by the Legislature, and there is no discretionary or limited powers. It is deplorable that offenders of tender years should not receive intelligent and discriminating treatment under the law. But the fault is in the inadequacy of the law. Pennsylvania seems to be far behind some other States in penal, and particularly in reformative legislation respecting children. In other States, notably Michigan, Iowa, Illinois, Massachusetts, legislation has been provided for juvenile and adult offenders, which has already born much fruit and promises greater results for the future. The working of the probation system in Massachusetts—where it has been in operation nine years appears to have more than justified the hopes of those who introduced the reforms. In Massachusetts more than 5,000 are released annually on probation, and the relapses to criminal life are very few. The system seems specially adapted to minors. There is every reason why Pennsylvania should take some forward step in enacting laws relating to young offenders.

Where modern legislation of this character has been tried it has had very great beneficial influence in reforming offenders and saving them from a criminal life, and in addition has saved the State money.

Where we were clearly shown at the last National Prison Congress, that our actual cost of crime in Philadelphia was $3.50 per capita for the whole population of the country, equal to $3,250,000 for this city it seems appalling, and we need to use the best known methods of reform to lessen the exacting taxation.

THE POLICE MATRONS at our station-houses have all proved well chosen and competent helps to the distressed wife and children, and to many a young girl who has commenced a life of shame brought under their observation by the officers. The entire number of women reported by the sixteen matrons, during the fiscal year as under their charge was 4,233. Of these many were aged, demented and homeless; those lost or seeking shelter were 773. Many were young, some strangers in the city, and to city life, who were restored, by a little effort, to respectable homes; some victims of the crimes of others or shamed and discouraged by disgrace.

The entire number of children reported is 2,978. Brought by parents, 279. Brought on personal charges for offences, 756. Lost, 1,498. The monthly reports of these devoted Matrons, to the Associated Committees, are filled with special cases of interest, and stir all true devotion to earnestness to devise new plans to reach and help the sufferers.

Mrs. L. W. Fletcher of the 6th District and Mrs. J. Poole of the 19th District are the oldest matrons in the work, having held appointment since September, 1886. Mrs. Fletcher has to do with that known as the tenderloin section, Eleventh street above Race. Within this district dwells a larger portion of girls and women whose vocation makes them liable to arrest more than any of the other thirty districts. Mrs. Fletcher has proved well-fitted for the work, the combination of good common sense, sympathetic gentleness and determined spirit which is hers, is one that is needed in the Sixth District more than any other perhaps. Mrs. Fletcher speaks of the many unfortunate girls brought to her as “her girls.” “They are to be pitied as much as condemned. Force of circumstances, I have learned, drives the majority of them into the lives they lead. Contact with them has taught me that few of them are wholly bad. Many can be made to see the folly of vice and led to abandon it.” She speaks authoritatively, and keeps track of many reclaimed, who are happy in their several employments as wage-earners, and owe their present happiness to her timely advice and sympathy.

Chinatown is in this division, and it exerts its worst influence; but kindness wins. They are not locked up in cells, but the matron places them in an upper room or ward. The matron is very seldom used roughly, her appearance seems to command respect, even from the most abandoned. She often accompanies them to court trial, and it is a comfort to them, they never fail to appreciate.

All our seventeen police matrons seem to be well-fitted for their work. Some of our lieutenants who have heretofore opposed having matrons for the female portion at station-houses, are beginning to see the folly of their former judgment. Our statute law requires every station-house to have a matron. Why is it not obeyed in the other fourteen districts?

WOMAN’S PRISON.—The women of the city of Brooklyn, N. Y., are urging the establishment there of a Woman’s Prison. How much better if it were a Reformatory. This is sadly needed in State of Pennsylvania, and especially in Philadelphia for the 350 women in our Penitentiary, County Prison and House of Correction; at the present time there is a movement to ask the Legislature to establish a Reformatory prison for women in the eastern part of Pennsylvania.

MRS. L. W. FLETCHER,

Police Matron, Sixth District, Philadelphia.

TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT OF JOHN J. LYTLE, GENERAL SECRETARY.

In presenting this, my Twelfth Annual Report, I feel more and more solemnly impressed with the magnitude of the work in which I have been for so many years engaged, the importance of which cannot be overestimated and I have faithfully endeavored to perform my duty, seeking for Divine guidance in all of my undertakings. The Pennsylvania Prison Society has its officers and an Acting Committee of fifty other members, who, by act of the Legislature, are made official visitors to the Penitentiary and County Prisons. They are particularly interested in visiting the Eastern Penitentiary and the two County Prisons in this city, and the House of Correction—though we have members who visit the County Prisons of the State and make reports to the General Committee. The members, after a careful visitation of the convicts in their cells, endeavor to gain their confidence, and thus become friends to them, which is kept up frequently long after their discharge. We encourage a correspondence with them after they leave the prison, so that we can retain an influence over them for good and continued good.

Many interesting letters have been received, showing that what has been done was warmly appreciated, and instances are not wanting where they are leading honest lives, and are willing to admit that the lives they had been leading were dragging them down in ruin and could thankfully say that their incarceration had been a blessing to them, and they had determined with the Lord’s help, to lead better lives.

We have earnest, faithful Christian women members of the committee who visit the women prisoners of the Penitentiary, the County Prisons, and the House of Correction. In this connection I desire to call attention to the efforts which are being made to establish a temporary Home for discharged women prisoners, an institution which has been much needed, where they can remain a short time until they can obtain situations, in the meantime being under Christian influences. There is also the Howard Institution for discharged women prisoners, situated on Popular street, near Sixteenth street, where they have a comfortable home and are taught house-work and laundry, and being expected to stay at least six months, there is hope for reformation for those who desire to lead better lives.

CORRESPONDENCE.

There continues to be an increasing interest in the subject of Penology, very much attributed to the publicity given through the meetings of the National Prison Congress held in various parts of the country. I receive very many letters asking for information and especially from libraries asking for complete files of our “Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy,” speaking of it as a very valuable publication. As our back numbers are now all disposed, and as requests continue to pour in upon us, I would be pleased if any to whom this Journal is sent, have back numbers previous to 1900 which they do not wish to keep, would send to the Secretary Fifth and Chestnut Sts., Phila.; it would enable us to fill orders from libraries.

WORK OF THE SOCIETY AND ITS ACTING COMMITTEE.

The Acting Committee meets monthly when reports are received from the Visiting Committee of the Eastern State Penitentiary, the two County Prisons, House of Correction, “Associated Committee of Women on Police Matrons,” General Secretary and from many of the County Prisons of the State.

It is much to be regretted that the press of our city gives so much publicity to the time when noted criminals are discharged. The impropriety of this is especially noticeable where the separate system prevails, for it undoes the secrecy which is so essential to reform. By it old crimes are recounted, and no matter how much a man desires to reform the way is closed for his obtaining employment, and he sees nothing else than to go back to his former criminal life. Every one should have an opportunity to reform, and his former career should not be published to the world. There have been cases where the press told in advance when a certain criminal was to be released, and I have seen crowds of men and boys waiting to see such a one come out.

THE EASTERN STATE PENITENTIARY.

For the benefit of those who have not seen our former Journals it may be again well to state that the institution is visited by a sub-committee of the Acting Committee set apart for this service, to each of whom is assigned a particular division, which he under the Constitution and By-Laws is expected to visit “at least once in two weeks and oftener if convenient.” (Extract from the Constitution.) Rev. Joseph Welch and his able assistant, Rev. H. Cresson McHenry devote their whole time to visiting the prisoners, and are doing a noble work for their spiritual good. Their task is a great one for with a population of over 1,200 it taxes their time to the utmost—this then is where the members of the Acting Committee perform valuable service.

From monthly reports received from those members it appears that 731 visits have been made to the Penitentiary during the past year, and 15,616 visits have been made to prisoners either inside the cells or at the cell doors. As many of the members failed to send in reports, the number visited will much exceed this.

The total amount expended for the relief of discharged prisoners from the Eastern Penitentiary and County Prison during the year was $3,364.03.

As the Legislature has for many years failed to make any appropriation for furnishing clothes or tools to those discharged, the whole burden of doing this rests upon our Society. Our income is entirely inadequate to do even a tithe of this large expense. We could only accomplish it by the liberality of our donors, for which we thank them, and desire their continued aid.

As for my own especial work at the Eastern Penitentiary, I visit there daily in addition to the many other duties I have to perform in connection with my office as General Secretary. I feel as time rolls on solemnly impressed with the magnitude and importance of the work in which I have for many years been engaged. No person leaves that prison without my visiting him several times previous to discharge, ascertaining their needs, and providing them with suitable clothes, that they may make a respectable appearance in looking for work; pleading, too, with them to give up all their sinful ways, and give their hearts to the Lord—for there are no joys comparable to the “Joys of God’s Salvation.” As I visit from cell to cell, not only at the time of discharge, but long previous to that, a feeling of awe comes over me as I realize that here is a soul to be saved or lost, one who has had no thought or concern for his soul’s salvation, and the query arises, have I, have we as visitors, done our duty, our whole duty, in telling him there is the promise that “whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved,” and that Jesus Christ our Saviour and Redeemer, came into the world to seek and to save those that were lost, and in Him there is pardon and plenteous redemption. I have during the past year made 352 visits to the Penitentiary, and have seen and conversed with the convicts, either in the cells or at the cell doors, over 4000 times. I have procured 164 railroad tickets for discharged prisoners to take them to their homes outside of the city, and have taken many to the depots, providing them with a good breakfast before starting. The cost of these tickets was $377.50.

I have assisted many after their discharge with temporary help, starting them in business in a small way that they may become wage-earners, thus preventing re-commitment. Tools are furnished to discharged prisoners when needed. Many have been aided in this way to obtain situations. For some days before and after New Year’s I distributed the motto calendars to every prisoner, visiting every cell and giving a word of counsel and encouragement, and a hearty shake of the hand to most of the 1,200 prisoners. It has been gratifying to notice with what pleasure these New Year’s calls have been received, as they respond, “A Happy New Year to you and many of them.”

These Christian motto calendars are hung up in their cells and are read over and over many times a day—such as these:

O! the things WE call the LITTLE sins,

Are hateful in GOD’S SIGHT;

HE counts NO SIN a LITTLE sin,

Nor calls a WRONG DEED—Right!

And

BEGIN thou first with LITTLE THINGS,

The smallest SIN AVOID and HATE;

Obedience to LOVE adds wings,

And LITTLE faith will grow to GREAT.

The statutes of the LORD are RIGHT—!

REJOICING the HEART.

(PSALM XIX: 8)

These silent messengers may be the means, under the blessing of our Heavenly Father, of reaching many souls and bringing them to Christ, their Saviour.

SOME CASES OF INTEREST WHICH HAVE COME TO OUR NOTICE.

A young man left the Eastern Penitentiary, perhaps three years ago, for one of the cities in Western Pennsylvania, determined to lead a new life. He gave assurance of having sought and found in our Lord Jesus Christ a full pardon for his old life and of his earnest purpose to walk in newness of life. He joined the Methodist Church, got good work, married, and has recently sent to his visitor, a member of our committee, a picture of their little baby. He writes a bright, happy letter.

A man who, while in the Penitentiary, seemed to feel the tremendous evil of his past life and an earnest desire for a better one, was led, as we believe, to pray and trust God’s spirit, we felt worked with him and not in vain. He went into a foreign country, and a few days ago we received a letter from him dated January 4, 1901, bright and happy, hoping soon to return.

About nine years ago a man left the Penitentiary and went to work for his brother-in-law, who was a baker, getting his board only. After some months he came to me saying he wanted to earn some money for himself, and asked me to get him work, even if it was as a laborer on the street. I dissuaded him from that, and encouraged him to remain, so that he might not only learn the business, but also to establish for himself a reputation. This advice was taken; he joined the Episcopal Church. I received a letter from his rector speaking in high terms of him. He afterwards went to another brother-in-law in one of the interior cities of our State. He remained there long enough to become thoroughly acquainted with that branch of business, saving up all his wages—to-day he has two establishments of his own, is married, and doing well.

Another is that of one who had a sentence of over twenty years for atrocious cruelty to an elderly couple in connection with a burglary—his second conviction. It seemed almost a hopeless case, but he was taken in hand by a faithful Christian member of our committee, joined the Episcopal Church, and is a sincere Christian, faithful, and trusted by his employer; has been out over ten years.

Another, to show how difficult it is for a discharged prisoner to obtain a situation. A man was discharged about whom there were strong doubts of his being guilty, not a crime against property. He was a skilled workman in an industry of which there are very few in this country, and such men are in demand. The foreman in the manufactory where he formerly worked agreed to take him the next morning. Calling the men together, he informed them that he was going to take —— back. They said if he did they would all strike—they would not work with an ex-convict. I boarded him for three weeks, getting odd jobs now and then, and finally sent him to New York, where he has employment in the same branch of business—have had a letter thanking me for what I did for him. Very many such cases could be mentioned. All these were aided on their leaving the prison.

THE OFFICERS.

The warden, D. W. Bussinger, who in the short time he has been in office has proved himself to be very efficient, and has instituted many important reforms. It is his aim to make it the model prison of the United States. He thoroughly understands what is needed, and is truly the right man in the right place.

George Dorward, called the “Principal Overseer,” is very faithful to his duties, and living in some of the apartments of the Penitentiary, is always at hand to render efficient services to the warden.

The Rev. Joseph Welch, the chaplain, officially called the “Moral Instructor,” and his able assistant, the Rev. H. Cresson McHenry, are earnestly desirous for the spiritual and temporal welfare of the prisoners, and are ever on the alert to instil into their minds the necessity for a change in their lives, to cease to do evil, and learn to do well. They devote their time to the good of the prisoner, and the result cannot fail to be beneficial. It is particularly gratifying that the Moral Instructor has such an able and valuable assistant. I have again to thank the warden and all of the overseers for the valuable assistance rendered me in the prosecution of my work, which requires much tact and judgment in determining what is best to be done in such cases.

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON AND ANNEX.

The Visiting Committee report 848 visits to the prison during the past year, and including the new convict prison at Holmesburg, 6,191 visits reported to prisoners either in the cells or at the cell doors.

The prisons are in good condition, and well kept, and are models for county prisons. It is much to be regretted that every one committed, especially those before trial, could not be kept in a separate cell. Many of those were in prison for the first time, and often associated with hardened criminals, thus rendering our county prisons the nurseries of crime.

Robert C. Motherwell makes a most valuable and faithful Superintendent.

Too much credit cannot be given to the faithful visits of the lady members of the committee, who have religious opportunities with the women, and many of whom have had situations obtained for them, and are known to be leading exemplary lives. Their mission does not cease with their release from prison, but a watchful care is extended to them after their discharge.

The Rev. Joseph J. Camp, the Prison Agent, appointed by the Inspectors, is also a member of the Acting Committee. He has seen many years of service there, and holds a position which is invaluable, and could not well be dispensed with. There are numberless cases of persons who should not be committed to the County Prison. Those cases he faithfully investigates, and secures from the magistrates their release as soon as possible. Very many boys run away from home, stealing rides on freight trains—they are arrested, and sent to prison. He looks up such cases, writes to the parents, who reply that it is their desire that they should be sent back. They are by that time very penitent, and are put on the cars for home. He acts, too, as a peacemaker between families. We honor him for the good work he is doing.

Frederick J. Pooley, the agent of the Society at the County Prison is displaying much zeal and energy in the performance of his arduous duties, and I can but repeat what I have heretofore said of him. He is in love with his work, and feels that God is blessing his services there. He says that while there are many clouds along his pathway, yet he sees more of the sunshine that leads him on to greater efforts in the work in which God has been pleased to call him. His earnest desire is that he may be a benefit both in spiritual and temporal things to those who have become inmates of a prison-cell. Services are held there every Sabbath in the morning for the men, in the afternoon for the women. Once a month he has charge of the latter, and is listened to with marked attention. The committee as well as the management of the County Prison is fortunate in securing the services of such a valuable assistant. He takes especial interest in looking after the many boys who get into trouble—often runaways from home, whom he sends back. Interesting letters have frequently been received from them.

Some of the cases are worthy of mention. One whom he sent to Atlantic City writes thus: “I take pleasure in letting you know I have got work, and to let you know what a little kindness and good advice will do for a poor fellow who is struggling to lead an honest life.” In reply, he advised him to attend some place of worship and to keep from drink. Again the boy writes: “I will try to live up to your advice; I attended church this A. M., the first time in years, and with the help of God, I cannot go wrong. I am working every day, but I am making an honest living—honest dollars are the best kind of dollars—I have fully made up my mind to that.”

A boy whom he sent home to his parents in Newark, N. J., writes: “I am going to work this P. M., and with God’s help, will try to make a man of myself.”

Another boy says, “I owe you a debt of gratitude that can never be paid;” and another writes, “I am going to night-school, to church and Sunday-school, and am trying to be a good boy.”

From a boy he sent home: “I arrived in Baltimore safe, and my mother met me at the depot. I thank you very much for your kindness to me.”

These are cases of boys who have ran away from home, steal rides on freight cars and are arrested when they are arrived and sent to the County Prison, often put in with those who are adepts in crime, their parents are written to, who request that they be sent home. If the money is not sent for the return fare, the Prison Society pays it. Much good is done in this way.

CHESTER COUNTY PRISON.

William Scattergood, President of the Board of Inspectors, and a member of the Acting Committee of our Society visits that prison weekly. He is much interested in the welfare of the prisoners. It is well managed, kept clean, and is in an admirable condition. A new wing has been erected for the women, of whom they have very few.

DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON.

This prison is faithfully visited by Deborah C. Leeds, who reports it to be in good condition and well managed. She holds services there very frequently, which are much appreciated, and her remarks are listened to with marked attention.

OTHER COUNTY PRISONS.

Deborah C. Leeds has been appointed “Visitor to the County Prisons of the State at Large.” In virtue of this appointment, she has visited many of the County Prisons, speaking to the inmates as way opens for it, encouraging them to give up their evil ways and lead new and better lives, looking unto the Lord for help in this respect, without which their efforts will be in vain.

ACTING COMMITTEE VISITS.

To Eastern Penitentiary

731

visits

to

15,616

Prisoners.

To County Prison, Annex, and House of Correction

848

“

“

6,191

“

Genl. Secretary to Eastern Penitentiary

352

“

“

4,000

“

1,931

25,807

POLICE MATRONS.

The Associated Committee of Women on Police Matrons hold meetings monthly, at which reports are received from the different station-houses where there are matrons in number. A number of interesting cases are reported monthly, of women missing trains, and shelter given them until next morning, feeble-minded women wandering from home—children lost, etc.—These are kindly cared for by the matrons.

It is sad to find such a large number who were arrested for being intoxicated.

Thankful to my Heavenly Father that He has, as I reverently believe, called me to this work and that through all these years He has given me health and strength to perform it, and that I may be more faithful in winning souls unto Christ, and invoking the Divine blessing upon my labor, and that ability may be given me to perform the service with increased zeal and earnestness, with a single eye to the glory of God, and to the advancement of the Redeemer’s kingdom on the earth, this report is respectfully submitted.

JOHN J. LYTLE,

General Secretary.

At a meeting of the Acting Committee, held 10th month, 18th, 1900, the Committee on Memorials for deceased members presented the following, in relation to our late fellow-member, Henry M. Laing.

In Memoriam.

HENRY M. LAING, our late esteemed Treasurer, died at Colorado Springs, Colorado, August 1st, 1900, in his 80th year. Funeral ceremonies were held at Friends’ Meeting House, 15th and Race street, Monday, August 13, several members of our Acting Committee attending.

It seems fitting that there should be a minute of record of our esteemed brother, who for nearly 20 years—1873-1892—served the society so honorably and so well, as Treasurer, in the care of its funds, and who had been an active member for many years, beside also being a life member. We revere his memory, as one whom we desire to think of, whose manly disposition and straightforward conscientious dealings led us all to regard most favorably.

Full of years the Lord called him, and we hope to meet him beyond the river of death.

May this note be recorded, and a copy sent to the surviving children by our Secretary.

GATHERED FROM REPORTS AND OTHER SOURCES.

CHANGE OF TREATMENT URGED.

At the discussion on criminals, before the State Board of Charities and Correction, Albany, N. Y., last December, a change of treatment was urged, that “Reformation and not punishment should be the end sought.” Dr. Wm. P. Spratling, Medical Superintendent of Craig Colony for Epileptics, said in part: “I would recommend the following: First—Prevent insanity, epilepsy, imbecility, idiocy, and feeble-mindedness as far as possible by making it impossible for them to marry. Second—By building less expensive structures in which defective and dependent State charges shall live. Third—Maintain at less cost the cases that are chronic and incurable, and maintaining at even greater cost those that probably can be cured. Fourth—By giving those that ought to have it an education that they can use in the institution that cares for them, or that they may use in the outer world when they leave the institution.”

Thomas Sturgiss, of New York City, chairman of the Board of Managers of the Elmira Reformatory, read a paper on “The Treatment of the Criminal.” The object of the discussion was to devise some plan for the adoption of a true system of treatment in any and all penal institutions, and the plan determined was

“First—Centralization of prisons of every kind other than those of temporary detention only, under State control.

“Second—That all prisons shall be taken out of politics, and that they shall be administered by men who are making this profession a scientific study and a life work.

“Third—A classification of all criminals, and a division of them among institutions according to such analysis.

“Fourth—The specializing of such institutions to the end that each may receive only that class or classes to the treatment of which its situation, its staff, and its system are deliberately adapted.

“Fifth—Experience shows that such classification cannot be made by the courts, for lack of time and absence of expert testimony. Provision should be made for such analysis by the head of the institution to which the prisoner is first sent, and that subsequent transfer in accordance with such analysis should be legalized both as to the power of the transferring officer and of the prison to which the transfer is made.

“Sixth—The adoption of the principle that reformation (reformation of character) and not punishment is the end sought by imprisonment, with such application of the indeterminate sentence and the parole system as the class and condition of the prisoner and the character of the management may justify.

“The time has gone by when we seek to punish the criminal simply. Punishment as a deterrent has failed. We now seek to reform, if we can, and to seclude for the protection of society if we cannot. Education and training in self-control and in the ability to do useful wage-earning work, are the basis of reform.

“Whatever the system in any prison, it should contain, high above everything else, the element of hope. This should never be abandoned while life lasts, if the mental powers are normal. Omit this and you take away the strongest inspiration to reform and substitute despair. Include it and you give the guardian of the prisoner his strongest weapon; and to the prisoner himself, a gleam of light in the surrounding darkness, shining from the open door through which, if he wills it, he may once again pass to finish his life experience under the conditions of freedom.”

“Every prison from a jail up should be in some measure a reformatory, an institution where the inmates received instruction in industrial pursuits, in wage-earning labor, in letters, and moral precepts.”

Secretary McLaughlin of the N. Y. State Prison Commission, stated that the present prison population of the State in custody was 10,350 (being a decrease in five years of 2,311) of these 1,197 were women of which 342 were in the workhouse, Blackwell’s Island.

Among the State improvements suggested were:

1. In order to furnish the convicts with employment under the present Constitution, further legislative restriction should cease and officers and institutions should comply with the law in good faith.

2. The state should furnish the prisons with new and modern buildings, especially at Sing Sing and Auburn.

3. The hope to see the lock-step and the prison stripes suppressed among the prisoners of the higher grades in every prison.

4. When prisoners, whose education has been utterly neglected are received, there should be compulsory education in the common English branches.

5. An efficient parole law should be adopted applicable to the State’s prisons. Such a law is recommended by the Commission and by the Superintendent and wardens of prisons.

6. The State should watch over a man after his discharge from prison, aid him in finding employment, and in the meantime, render him assistance if necessary.

7. It has been wisely suggested that even life prisoners should be under some system of parole. Probably by special enactment. There are 177 life convicts, many are not habitual criminals, but convicted of murder in the second degree, while in heat of passion or under the influence of liquor. Some have already served 20 to 40 years.

STATE PRISON DILEMMA.

Some “prison reformers” so-called, seem to be laboring under the impression that it is possible to keep convicts profitably employed without subjecting free labor of some sort to competition. A moment’s reflection, however, shows that this impression is erroneous. The best that can be done is to distribute industries in the prisons so as to reduce competition to the minimum, and that it is the policy which the State is now pursuing. A sash and door factory has just been established at Sing Sing, the output of which is to be used in public buildings. This leaves the market for sashes and doors practically to the free labor employed in that industry, and yet the fact remains, that but for this prison factory the State would have to patronize the other ones. The Amended Constitution and recent legislation in conformity with it have rendered the task of keeping convicts at work a problem. Of course they might be employed piling and unpiling stones in the prison grounds for no other purpose than to prevent them from being idle. But experience has proved that fruitless work of this sort is bad for convicts, tending to demoralize them. Unless they are given something to do worth doing they grow morbid and ripe for further mischief. Road-making as an experiment may be worth trying. The Superintendent of prisons says he finds it exceedingly difficult to keep convicts employed without antagonizing the Constitution, until the Legislature makes the present law mandatory.

HOW TO DEAL WITH WICKED MEN.

The prevention and cure of crime, the best methods for this, says Frank B. Sanborn, the political economist of Massachusetts—why “Prison science is in its infancy, so far as the world at large is concerned.” Pathetic and humiliating is the tardy advance made in this direction. Very provoking to the enlightened are the dull indifferences and frequent hallucination of the community in regard to the treatment of criminals.

Gradually, however, there has grown up in regard to a large class of criminals, the so-called “first offenders,” most rapidly in these United States, and chiefly in the past thirty years, something that may justly be turned “prison science.”

Its best examples are in the men’s prison at Elmira, which is the outgrowth of Mr. Brockway’s half century of experience in controlling and instructing convicts, and in the woman’s prison at Sherborn, Mass., lately under the inspiring government of Mr. Johnson.

As yet the criminals of longer habituation in guilt have come but little under this new development of prison science, except that in some States they now receive an added sentence when proved to be an old offender. But the tendency is where crime is best understood, to establish a small class of “incorrigibles,” for whom perpetual imprisonment shall be the sentence.

This is on the theory that such can never be safely returned to the community, upon which they are found perpetually preying, with a reasonable hope that they can be cured of evil habits. From these, should be distinguished a much greater class of criminals, who are temporarily incorrigible, but will yield to the methods, somewhat prolonged.

WHERE DEATH PENALTY IS NEEDED.

Governor Dockery, of Missouri, in his message to the Legislature of that State, recommends a law prescribing the death penalty for kidnappers of children for ransom. Also recommends that it be enacted in every State. It should also apply to another crime, which our penal laws do not properly reach—railroad train wrecking, which is often attended with a wholesale slaughter of life, and those who commit it seldom receive their just punishment, though abhorred and dreaded more than the ordinary murderer.

THE LOCK-STEP.

At Sing Sing prison the lock-step has been abolished for first offenders; it ought to be given up everywhere. The men are often identified as having been to N. Y. State Prison by the shuffling habit; a military step has been substituted. Superintendent Collins has noticed that the lock-step has grown on a prisoner to such an extent, that he will fall in behind people on the street unconsciously in true lock-step fashion.

A gang of convicts belonging to Class A, all carpenters or masons, were sent to work on the new prison at Mapanoch, Ulster Co., N. Y., and 250 from Clinton and Auburn. The new prison will cost $700,000. It was first intended for a reformatory, but the plan was changed to a State prison with accommodation for 1,000 convicts.

GRADING AND CLASSIFYING OF PRISONERS.

From the Report of the Board of Control, Iowa.

This is carefully done in all our reformatories, but in the State penitentiaries and penal institutions very rarely. It seems fitting now, that the public desire is not only to hold the convict, but to encourage self help, by a system of regular graded or progressive classifications of prisoners, based on character, and operated on a system of marks. Hope should be made an ever present force in the minds of the prisoner, by a system of rewards for good conduct, that carries with it a promotion from a lower to a higher grade.

In connection with this system of classification, a well regulated parole and indeterminate sentence law will be enacted by the Legislature; thereby placing the destiny of the prisoner in his own hands, and by his own exertions to continually better his condition. The object of imprisonment and prison government is for the protection of society and for the reformation of the prisoner. It is plain the State does not discharge its obligation until one or both these objects have been clearly accomplished. If the prisoner cannot be reformed, he must be held indefinitely, yet the parole system in connection with established grades may be so administered as to secure these results. It is better than a definite sentence (that does not reform) without a provision of parole; but more effective when coupled with the reformatory or indeterminate sentence, because it makes a stronger appeal to the convict for his co-operation.

It is gratifying to know that this is to be introduced into all the State penal institutions of Iowa.

RECLAIMED CRIMINALS BY PAROLE LAWS.

It is only in recent years that the idea of making a good man out of a bad one has had any prominence in the penal system. The old idea was simply to punish the criminal and lock him away from honest people so he could do them no more harm. The actual result seemed to have proved that it made him more proficient in the school of crime. In many States this evil still exists. In New York State for example, seventy per cent. of the released convicts return to criminal lives. Several other States have tried the plan of releasing well-behaved convicts, with comparatively clean records, finding work for them, and keeping them under surveillance until assured of their reform. Here are the results:

Offenders Redeemed.

Returned to Crime.

Pennsylvania

85

per cent.

15

per cent.

Ohio

90

“

10

“

New Jersey

95

“

5

“

Indiana

94

“

6

“

Connecticut

100

“

None.

Utah

100

“

None.

Michigan

94

“

6

per cent.

Alabama

96

“

3

“

Virginia

100

“

None.

Minnesota

92

“

8

per cent.

The convicts themselves are enthusiastic in praise of the new plan, for many of them would prefer to lead honest lives if given a fair chance. “The Star of Hope,” a paper written and printed by the convicts of the N. Y. State Prisons, is full of articles in favor of the parole system, which the convicts hope to see adopted throughout the State. At present, it applies to the Elmira Reformatory only.

Indiana State Prison, at Michigan City, has had the parole system in force three years; 132 prisoners have been paroled, 6 have been returned for violation of their parole, 2 have failed to report, and we do not know where they are. We consider this a good showing for the management. We have now 80 men on parole, who make report promptly, earning all the way from $5 to $40 per month and their board, in many cases caring for their families, that would otherwise be a public charge upon the township where they live had the prisoner been kept in confinement.

PROPOSED MARRIAGE REFORM.

The Tri-State Medical Society of Tennessee, Alabama and Georgia, in session at Chattanooga, have taken steps to secure medical Legislation in those three States, for the purpose of regulating or prohibiting the marriage of habitual criminals, or persons afflicted with incurable diseases, drunkards and victims of harmful drugs.

CONTRACT, PRICE-PIECE, STATE ACCOUNT.

Formerly the contract plan was followed in most penitentiaries, the labor of each convict being hired out in a certain industry at a fixed sum per day. This has been succeeded in many States by what is known as the price-piece plan, where the contractors pay for the convict labor at so much for each piece of work done; and in other States by manufacturing done on the account of the State.

The contract system, where it is possible to contract the labor at a fair price, is undoubtedly the best one for the State. In such case the State only furnishes the room, heat and labor, saves the great outlay for machinery and power.

If proper contract labor cannot be had for our penitentiaries, then the price-piece plan is the best, and if it is not possible to employ the convicts in any other way, then we should resort to proper industries to be carried on, by State account, like New York.

The convict should be employed, either by contract or price-piece plan before resorting to manufacture on State account. Many a warden at the National Prison Congress, has shown that they could have all the contract or price-piece work that they could do if the law permitted it, but it is the everlasting fear of antagonizing force labor.

When we find that the entire output of all the penitentiaries in the United States during 1899, for the five principal things manufactured in prison was only one-tenth of one per cent, it does seem strange that any Trades’ Union would be unwilling to have the State by employment care for the health and best interests of their sons and brothers detained!

CONVICT LABOR ON STATE FARMS.

Mississippi Penitentiary Board of Control find farming their best interest, have leased 9,350 acres of cleared land on which was worked 720 convicts, the net revenue past year estimated at $100,000. The State has purchased 3,000 acres on which 80 convicts will be employed, and they have set apart $80,000 to purchase not more than 12,000 acres.

ROAD MAKING FOR CONVICTS.

The most valuable contributions in some respects, is the report of the Industrial Commission on “Prison Labor,” Washington, D. C., in the brief part which deals with what is not prison labor at all, but the labor of convicts outside of prisons—building and repairing roads—an employment which meets the demands of intelligent and practical reasoners, and seems to solve the problem of prison labor from a humanitarian standpoint. Mention is here made to call attention to it.

INDUSTRIAL REFORMATORIES.

New York State Reformatory, Elmira, is one of the oldest institutions of the kind in the United States. Has about 1500 convicts. As the State does not permit the sale of their product in open market, the institution has become more than ever a great trades school. Thirty-six industries are taught, beside mental, physical, and industrial training, including education in the school of letters. Several of the literary schools are taught by convicts trained for that department.

The trade of the convict is determined by the Superintendent, according to the advice of his relatives, and the surroundings he is likely to return to. Of the 658 discharged in 1899, 82 per cent. went directly to the trade practiced in the Reformatory.

It is a very busy place, the convict plying his trade industriously, not to be sold or serve some useful purpose, but only to give him practice and skill; when completed it is destroyed, then done over again. The disposition to excel in skill and excellence has a tendency to make them better men. Almost every visitor is impressed with the conviction, that labor here so exquisitely performed, should be applied to some useful purpose and the articles sold.

The carefully prepared system of grading is admirable. A prisoner when he enters is placed in the second grade; he may work up to the highest grade, shorten his term, secure his liberty by good conduct, and proficiency in trades and school work. The lowest grade is cared for much like the prisoners in the penitentiary, the middle grade fare better, have a table-cloth and other privileges, the highest grade have better food and clothing, privileges to converse, and order their food and pay for it out of their own funds. The system seems to rest on three ideas—1st, indeterminate sentence. 2nd, parole provisions of the law. 3rd, the trades and marking system. Gross cost per capita in 1899, $153.85.

MASSACHUSETTS STATE REFORMATORY, CONCORD.

Receives men from 18 to 35; if guilty of crime more than three times, cannot be sent here. The training-school is very much like Elmira, N. Y. After they become proficient in these schools, they pass into the industrial department and are employed at various kinds of productive labor. Sloyd system work is very prominent, forenoons spent in the trades schools, and afternoons in the shops. Prisoners alternate, so that both shops and industrial training-schools are in full operation all of the day.

Products of the shops are furnished other State institutions. They manufacture cotton and woolen goods (having a $35,000 plant of machinery). All weaving is done by hand-looms, made in the institution. There are over twenty industries and the institution uses all the money it earns.

The average convict’s stay is fifteen months, yet it is possible he may work out in a year, and he may be kept two years if convicted for a felony. About half the prisoners remain full time for which they are committed. They have 300 acres of land, and twenty acres are inside the prison walls, 1022 cells; prisoners go out on good records made in school and shop.

ILLINOIS REFORMATORY, PONTIAC.

Has 1,379 inmates between 12 and 21 years. Boys under 16 go to school daily, over 16 years three-quarters of a day. Trades schools and productive labor, contracted out certain sum per hour. Eighty-five per cent. conduct themselves properly, and the authorities keep track of them for a year after they leave. The average stay is 19 months, a few go out in a year. First grade men eat in a dining-room, the rest in their cells. Cost per capita, $120.

THE JUVENILE COURT OF CHICAGO.

Has been in operation over one year, and it has rescued 1,250 children, three fourths of whom have been paroled and placed in charge of probation officers. It is against the law of Illinois to imprison, even in a police-station, any child under twelve years of age, before, during or after trial. In case of necessity the child is to be committed to some suitable institution. The purpose of the plan is to give a boy another chance in his own home under the oversight of a probation officer. The business of the officer is to establish relations of friendship with the boy’s parents, and with the boy himself, and to take pains to secure that the surroundings in which the boy is growing up shall be such as to minister to a decent life. This is another step in that probation system which has long succeeded so well in Massachusetts and which ought to be established in every State in the country. One interesting fact in connection with the workings of the Juvenile Court, is, that the Judge and the probation officers have learned that it is practically hopeless to expect satisfactory results where a boy is a confirmed cigarette-smoker.

SLOYD WORK.

This is not a trade, but a system of teaching, by draughting plans, used in manual training-schools and some of our reformatories. It ought to be introduced in all our reformatories, and would be extremely useful in the prisons among those of long terms with work, for it establishes practical thoughts as a foundation for a trade when dismissed.

NOVEL PUNISHMENT.

When Mayor James L. Schaadt, of Allentown, Pa., began his office a year ago, new ideas were inaugurated for evildoers, and generally with good effect. When but a few days in office, a party of boys were brought before him on some trivial charge of disorder. The offence needed some punishment, and the parents were too poor to pay even a small fine. The Mayor learned the family shingle was still in use in the boys’ homes, and as the boys were too young to send to the station-house for a day or two, the Mayor sent the boys home with instructions that they should be soundly spanked by their parents as a punishment, and to report at court the next day whether their sentence had been carried out. The scheme worked well until some of the fathers refused to do it, then the Mayor did it himself until he tired of it, and finally it was required to be done in the court-room by the police officer; the plan has worked well and the number has greatly decreased.

On many prisoners fines are imposed, and he trusts them to be paid on instalments, and they never fail to satisfy the obligation. It acts as a deterrent to committing a like crime. Squads of tramps are put to work on the city streets without guard, and they very soon skip out of town, fearing re-arrest and a long sentence.

THE WHIPPING-POST.

Judge S. C. Baldwin, of Philadelphia, is in favor of the lash, or whipping-post, for incorrigible boys, and especially for wife-beaters, as they are often the only support of the wife and children. The September Grand Jury made such a recommendation before Judge Pennypacker, and he considered it worthy of consideration. But most of our Judges considered it not in harmony with the twentieth century ideas, and were unwilling to express any decided opinion offhand, as the whipping-post was a radical change. Judge Michael Arnold thought it would shock the public mind too much, and that the reason why our present plans fail is because the prisoner has too easy a time in jail, not required to work. Judge Robert N. Wilson held that in detaining a husband it often caused more suffering to the wife and children to be deprived of support, and it was a serious question whether it would not be degrading and lower a man’s whole moral nature.

Judge Wm. W. Whitbank thought the matter too radical to be decided without a careful consideration.

Judge Abraham M. Beitler had very decided views, but the public does not realize the situation. If they would only sit one day in court and see the cases of brutality brought before us, they would very soon recommend more drastic punishment. What are you going to do with a man who beats his wife in a most brutal manner (while drunk, generally), but who is the sole support of that wife and children? If you put him in jail you inflict ten times more suffering on his family.

In regard to the opinion of the Grand Jurymen, that the House of Refuge is not operating for the good of society, because not all the boys are reformed and converted, all the Judges unanimously expressed themselves as not in sympathy with the view taken by the Grand Jury, for we all know of very many cases where the House of Refuge has done splendid work. One of the Judges said:

“You cannot hope to make a law-abiding citizen out of every criminally disposed boy, and you cannot say that, because a few cases have not been benefited apparently, that the House of Refuge is a failure. I believe, on the contrary, that it is doing a most excellent work in elevating the morals of the community.”

THE BERTILLON SYSTEM.

In the past year the Bertillon system has been introduced in several of the States (it ought to be in all). Iowa has just found it very desirable. New York State has had it several years, proved of great value, not only in identifying prisoners, but in the identification of several meeting with sudden deaths in railroad accidents. By this system identification becomes positive and certain, as often as the prisoner comes under the measuring instruments, it will be an easy task to lay bare a criminal’s history by referring to his card. If the Legislature would enact an indeterminate sentence or parole law, the effectiveness of the same would be wonderfully aided by this system of identification. There are some who contend that “the State has no right to use this system against the man”—then let us have something better—a law of the United States requiring every State to enthrone this system, and that a National Bertillon Bureau be established for all the convicts of our country. This would be of untold help, and many a time a man’s true character could be asserted before the Judge had pronounced an unjust or inadequate sentence. This present Congress will be implored to establish this National System, by the advice and recommendation of the National Prison Congress.

RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF THE INSANE.

Last fall the press often seemed to indicate a startling increase of insanity among the inmates of the New York State prisons, and it aroused scientific discussion. As the number was larger from those prisons where work was silent, it was held that the want of exercise was the cause. But when it was shown that from the Elmira Reformatory, where work is constant, 65 were transferred to the State Hospital at Matteawan, the State prison authorities cannot account for the sudden increase. Over 700 the past year were sent to this hospital from penal institutions.

Who can measure the value of services to those restored as producers, and who would lower the standard of care, if it would result in preventing a single recovery? Many live in hospitals surrounded with everything necessary to their comfort and who may never fully recover, but their burdens are lightened and lives sweetened so far as it is possible to do so.

Hospital treatment of the insane in this country has made great strides in the right direction past few years, by substituting proper and healthful employment in place of mechanical restraint, thus stimulating a return in the patient to normal conditions, and naturally improving the prospect of final recovery.

The hospital of to-day is not a prison. It is a place where those skilled in the treatment of mental and nervous diseases continually minister to those affected; where health-promoting vocations are encouraged; where books, magazines, music and entertainments contribute to the pleasure and restoration to health of patients.

It is a startling fact that of those who were discharged as recovered nearly one-half had been received at the hospitals within a month or two after the affliction, and most all of them were afflicted less than a year prior to their admission.

In view of this fact, it becomes the duty of friends and persons afflicted with insanity (whether in prison or out of it) to see to it that they are early placed in the hospitals, for the probabilities of recovery are greatly in their favor.

Music both vocal and instrumental, has been found to be exceedingly valuable to restoring unbalanced minds; even brass bands and orchestras have been an untold help.

The people of our State have a right to expect that its insane who are cared for at its hospitals, shall have the best medical skill and attention, and the best care that can be given them; pleasant surroundings and good dietary. To this end let us continually labor to always maintain the highest standard of care for those unfortunates.

HAVANA PRISONS, CUBA.

Urafall Muntalso, warden of Havana Prison, last fall made a tour of the most noted prisons of the United States, with a view to adopting the best points of our system in the big Government institution of Havana, of which he is the head. He spoke of Sing Sing as being so different in all its features that one would imagine the institution conducted for another purpose entirely, instead of having exactly the same object. He gave high praise to our Eastern Penitentiary as a model institution of its kind, and to Warden Bussinger as certainly conducting it in a model manner. Several times expressed that the men seemed happy and contented as possible, being detained. Cuba so many generations under Spanish rule, with ancient views for punishments of convicts—to introduce American reform would seem almost revolutionary, but it must be done.

The penal institutions heretofore embodied all the unfavorable features of solitary confinement, and with very few of the favorable features. Education and employment of convicts in prison was out of the question. The convicts simply served out their sentence, not contributing in any way to their own support. By means of the reforms contemplated this will be largely changed. The intention is to improve the sanitary condition of all the penal institutions in Cuba, to alter the buildings to modern details, the men to do the work; then as rapidly as possible the humane American features will be introduced. Since Spanish rule has been cast off, the number of criminals and of crimes committed have been lessened over one-third. The cause is attributed to its present prosperity, thousands being employed, who were long time idle, keeping them honest and out of the hands of the law.

AUSTRALIAN PRISON REFORM.

Sydney, New South Wales, and in fact all Australian prisons were of the congregate system, free association. The recently introduced system of restricted association among prisoners is being gradually extended, though distasteful to the habitual criminal. Those seeking to reform, rejoice to be cut off from the degrading companionship. Captain Neitensteen, the Controller of New South Wales Prison, says: “There is every reason to hope the new departure will improve the moral atmosphere of all the jails, and will lead to the reformation of many prisoners. Already the number committed has decreased over 600, and the more serious crimes have received a check. Female prisoners have decreased to 180 prisoners last December, the lowest number in twenty-five years. The prisoners make all the clothing, boots, etc., for the officers and inmates, beside last year they earned £20,000 in work for the various Government departments repairing buildings, etc., outside the value of labor employed in the domestic work of the various jails.

“At Bathurst a complete marble-cutting and polishing plant has been erected, occupation to a large body of men. The waste lands attached to jails are now being cultivated, giving healthy out-door work of reformatory character, and supplies the greater portion of the food.”

PRISONS IN OLD PARIS.

[FROM THE GENTLEMAN’S MAGAZINE.]

Of the five principal prisons of Paris during the Reign of Terror, the most hopeless of all the horrible places on earth was the Conciergerie, whence few escaped, except to ride in the fateful tumbril which conducted them to the guillotine. All the other prisons fed this one. As many as 80 prisoners a day were sent to the scaffold, and the feeling of terror outside the prisons was almost equal to the dungeon. No one knew when his turn would come. Men’s faces were calm, but hearts filled with fear. Detectives and spies bore false witness everywhere, even the garçon who served you with a petit verre might be an agent of the Republic, whose report might send you to the Conciergerie in the evening, and on the morrow to the guillotine. The fatal roll call was read out daily. Men rushed to hear if their names were included in the list of victims. If not they breathed more freely, at least they had another day to live. But now how changed! look at the——

MODEL FRENCH PRISON.

A SANITARIUM, RETREAT, EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION WHERE CRIMINALS ARE HANDLED WITH KID GLOVES.

The new prison at Fresnes, eight miles from Paris, is the largest in the world. Takes the place of three old prisons, is situated in a healthy district, and covers with its main buildings, flower-gardens, and villa residences of officials, over half a square mile.

The prison is not built on the star plan, but consists of five rectangular blocks, one of which is the infirmary. The plan is the cellular, and the number of cells 1,824. Also accommodation provided on the association system for 400 privileged prisoners; total criminal capacity is 2,224. As a sanitarium for the criminal Fresnes is unique. As his or her present home, it boasts the proud record of being only half full, for crime or at least punishment by imprisonment for crime is diminishing in France. The system at Fresnes is interesting; the authorities believe in fresh air and sunshine, those foes of the microbe, and friends of health. Hence the prison is a model sanitarium. Otherwise the criminal is gently educated; he works at some trade, and can purchase from the proceeds of his work, extra food and personal requirements, with the exception of tobacco. When the prisoners go to worship, which is not compulsory, or to school which is, they wear hoods to prevent mutual recognition on release. In some of the workshops this rule does not obtain. The reason for this apparent inconsistency is not clear.

Even the officials receive instruction on such subjects as the prevention of crime and prison discipline, and as a result of this the excellent idea of the whole prison is admirably carried out. A final feature of Fresnes is the severe simplicity of its architecture.

SIBERIAN BANISHMENT.

The official messenger of the Czar of Russia at St. Petersburg, Oct. 1, 1900, published the Imperial ukase providing for the abolition of banishment at Siberia. The Czar commissioned the Minister of Justice to draw a law for abolishing such banishment. This was sanctioned by the Council of the Empire, and has been signed by the Czar, thus the law is now gazetted.

NORWAY PRISON.

A member of our Pennsylvania Prison Society, returning from the land of the midnight sun, reports his visit to the principal prison at Akerstuis, Christiania, Norway. When he made known that he was a member of the oldest Prison Society in the world he was shown the utmost attention by Director Peter Soelberg. He describes it as the congregate system, and being shown over the entire plant, the sleeping-cells, dining-room, baths, culinary departments, &c., describes it as exceedingly clean and neat with a purity of atmosphere. The chapel is very large and all the prisoners are required to attend service twice on Sundays and also on other days.

The workshops are many, and the trades pursued are carpentry, cabinet-work, blacksmithing, wheelwright, harness, boots and shoes, tinsmith, making all kinds of household utensils, and weaving by hand. If a prisoner has no trade, he is taught one before he goes out; their object is to turn out men reformed and able to make their own living. The prisoner receives part of the profits he made while in prison, to help him on his release, which is then paid to him. All the goods manufactured in prison are sold at a store outside, at a little less price, and the people go there to purchase, yet there is a fair profit made. The prisoners have outdoor exercise every day, they have a schoolmaster besides a moral instructor, and they are treated as erring brothers, called by their first name; the Director was horrified at the thought of our calling a man by a number, when the object was to reform him and make him appreciate his position as a citizen or subject of his country. Women prisoners were very few.

REV. R. HEBER BARNES,br /> Chairman Finance Committee and the Editorial Board.

THE NATIONAL PRISON CONGRESS.

CLEVELAND, OHIO, SEPTEMBER 22-26, 1900.

The meetings were held in the hall of the Young Men’s Christian Association, except on Sunday. There were 201 delegates present. Ohio had 40, and Pennsylvania next, with 25. The official delegates present from this Society were Mrs. Deborah C. Leeds, John J. Lytle, and Rev. R. Heber Barnes.

On the platform were Governor George K. Nash, Abraham Wiedner, Chairman of the local committee; Captain Edward S. Wright, President of the Association; Rev. D. Morgan Wood, of Plymouth Congregational Church; Hon. Frederick Howard Wines, LL. D., of Washington, D.C.; Rev. John L. Milligan, of Allegheny, Pa.; M. W. Beacom, who represented Mayor Farley, and others who had achieved national reputation for reform in prison work.

Director of Public Charities Abraham Wiedner, as Chairman of the local committee, presided, and made a brief speech of welcome. Rev. Dr. Morgan Wood made the opening prayer. Director Wiedner introduced Governor Nash.

GOV. GEORGE K. NASH, ADDRESS OF WELCOME.

To me has been assigned the pleasant duty to express to you, in behalf of the people of Ohio, a hearty welcome. We appreciate the honor of having you meet with us, and also the noble work in which you are engaged.

When the Association was first organized it was presided over for a number of years by that noble man, Rutherford B. Hayes. After his death another noble man from Ohio became your presiding officer; and I am glad that General Brinkerhoff is still in our midst.

My understanding is that there are two purposes in punishing crime. The first is to protect society; the second, to bring about the reformation of the prisoners. With these ends in view the prisons should always be healthful, but the prisoners should not live in luxury. The reformation of the prisoner is most desirable, and he should be treated with that end in view. If you succeed in reforming those men and women you have accomplished a most noble work. In your efforts you need and are entitled to the sympathy of all, and I give you a most hearty welcome to the old “Buckeye State.”

The chairman introduced CORPORATION COUNSEL M. W. BEACOM, who represented MAYOR JOHN H. FARLEY in his absence.

I wish to express the Mayor’s feeling of gratitude, that you have chosen this city for your conclave. Your purpose is not to further your own interest, but to uplift humanity. I take it that there is a tendency in the caring for criminals to run to sentimentalism. I think that all such theories should be laid aside, but the health and environment of the prisoners should be good. In behalf of the Mayor and the people of Cleveland I welcome you to this city.

HON. FREDERICK HOWARD WINES, LL.D.,

Responded in a graceful way to the addresses of welcome. He outlined the objects of work of the Association at some length. Dr. Wines is the Assistant Director of the United States Census, and, as Assistant Director, thought he ought to be the most popular man in Cleveland. He said he was very glad to come to Ohio, for it was his birthplace. What the Governor has said about the object of this organization was right so far as it goes. Not only do we mean to look after the interests of prisoners, while they are in prison, but also after they have been released, and even before they are put in prison. We want to know with reference to the prisoner what is desirable and possible to do for him. Dr. Wines spoke of the different theories held with reference to the criminal class. One view, he said was held generally by many religious people, and it was that since all people were bad, the so-called prison class was no worse than the other class except in being less fortunate. The other extreme view was, that the average prisoner had so inherited criminal tendencies, that all efforts to reform him would prove futile. The truth, he said, lay somewhere between these two extremes.

ADDRESS.

CAPTAIN EDWARD S. WRIGHT, PRESIDENT OF THE ASSOCIATION.

We all retain memories of having regard for all the men and women who have been helpers in the work we have in hand. One name will always stand highest, that of General Rutherford B. Hayes, for ten years our President, and to many of us a type of a gallant American gentleman. His life and labor in the promotion of humanity in prisons, and the reformation of the imprisoned, are crystalized in the records of the proceedings of the Association.

Following the history of prison reform work in the world, and especially in this country, he said, “Thus it has come about that a cellular system of confinement in separation in the intervals of work has come to be called the American System of imprisonment. In nearly all the prisons of this country details may vary in some points, but in the main the prisons closely resemble each other. No better form of imprisonment has yet been devised. Nearly all these changes in prison discipline of the United States have taken form in the latter part of the century.”

“The Constitution laws, of nearly all the States have been enacted since the National Prison Association took strong grounds in favor of this feature, in which reward and punishment go hand in hand. A system of classification first introduced in the Elmira Prison Reformatory has been adopted in substance by the majority of all classes and

GRADES OF PRISONS.

As the work goes on it will be found to lead step by step to the indeterminate sentence law, or a system which holds the prisoner in the control of the law, until he has given evidence of a reformed life.

EDUCATION.

An interesting change in the method of conducting prison schools deserves consideration. Illiterate prisoners of all ages, cripples, and men of clouded intellect are brought into a real school, with hours of instructions each day. Education is only given in the elementary branches, but such great progress has been made, that it would seem possible to extend its curriculum especially with the long sentenced offenders.

PRISON LABOR

remains an unsettled problem, except its future in the South, and here and there in the North, where the expense of support has been met by the earnings, show no inclination to adopt measures really leading up to its eventual abolition as a means and measure in prison discipline.

“Convicts should be constantly employed in intelligent labor or work having a beneficial object and result. We should all hope that common humanity, which underlies all hearts, must some day agree upon a system of labor for all ages and conditions, it has been considered a man’s common heritage; the most helpful to his restoration to honesty and virtue.

BERTILLON SYSTEM OF IDENTIFICATION.

“To promote efficiency to the system of measurement and photography throughout the country, Congress will be asked to enact and establish such a National Bureau. When that has been secured, many facts as to crime and criminals can be made plain to all. For the repeater, severity is mercy. On that thought much could be said, for it underlies all systems and methods of modern prison discipline. If we contrast the conditions, methods, and laws now the rule in all prisons with those of one hundred years ago, there is great reason for thankfulness and hope for the future.”

At the adjournment of the evening session a reception was held in the parlor of the Y. M. C. A., where all the visitors shook hands with Governor Nash.

The headquarters were at the Colonial Hotel, where most of the delegates stopped. The delegates were furnished with a badge, and also a package of twenty trolley-car tickets to ride on any of the lines. These were donated by the car line management.

SUNDAY MORNING, SEPTEMBER 23d.

The delegates met at the Colonial Hotel and marched to the Epworth Memorial M. E. Church to listen to the annual sermon by Rev. Ward Beecher Pickard, D.D. It was a masterly production, so well filled with good thoughts, that it was constantly referred to throughout the sessions.

The theme of Dr. Pickard’s sermon was “God’s child, the criminal.” I refrain from any extracts as it is to be published for general distribution, as a leaflet, for a help to prison workers.

Sunday evening, at the Old Stone Church, Chaplain Rev. John L. Milligan, General Secretary, made the invocation prayer, Chaplain William J. Batt read the Scripture lesson, and the evening was taken up with short popular addresses on prison reform, by President Wright on the aims of work of the Association, Hon. Samuel J. Barrows on the International Penitentiary Congress, held at Brussels, Belgium, General R. Brinkerhoff of Ohio, Hon. H. H. Hart of Illinois Children’s Home and Aid Society, Professor Rev. C. R. Henderson, University of Chicago.

MONDAY, 9 A. M., SEPTEMBER 24TH.

WARDENS’ ASSOCIATION MEETING.

PRESIDENT’S ANNUAL ADDRESS, ALBERT GARVIN,

WARDEN CONNECTICUT STATE PRISON.

It contained a number of striking features. He strongly advocated the adoption of the indeterminate sentence plan, and that of productive labor. Among other things he said:—“The absolute indeterminate sentence for all prisoners except life convicts is, in my opinion, the only logical method of dealing with the delinquent classes. Upon criminals it should operate as a definite deterrent influence. To habitual offenders it would be a danger sign, and it would beget new risks in the commission of crime. Under it the sifting process, by which the reformable prisoners are sorted from the incorrigibles, could be intelligently applied; powerful motives for the abandonment of criminal practices would be created, and safeguards for the protection of society would be erected.”

The State might as reasonably send an insane person to an asylum for a definite time, as to convict a criminal to a prison for a specific period. If the management in the one case is competent to discharge, why not in the other?

“From every penal institution in the country convicts are being regularly discharged, who as the management only too well knows, will promptly resume the criminal program which was temporarily interrupted by a term of prison.

“Every consideration of social welfare demands that, on the one hand the criminal should be kept under restraint until he is fit to be released, and that, on the other hand once fit to be released, he should be conditionally discharged. This system should not only afford the largest measure of protection to life and property, but it would also supply the most practical method for the reformation of the offender.”

The galling fire which is kept up against productive labor in penal institutions, is born of a mistaken or partial view of the situation, and is not justified by the whole body of facts in the case. It is estimated that the value of the products of penal institutions does not exceed one tenth of one per cent of the total value of the products of the manufacturing industries of the whole United States. This fact renders it obvious that the economic and competitive effect of convict labor upon free labor is in the aggregate insignificant, and that it wholly fails to justify the persistent warfare which some people take pleasure in waging against prison industry.

It would be superfluous to state in a gathering of this kind, that regular and intelligent employment is absolutely essential to the moral and physical welfare of convicts, and the enforced idleness begets sullenness, immorality, sickness, insanity, and retards, if indeed it does not entirely prevent, the improvement of which the prisoners might otherwise be susceptible. In all intelligent efforts to reform convicted criminals, work is an indispensable factor—and only productive labor is reformative labor. Both the practical and the ethical requirements of the situation make for productive labor.

ADDRESS BY H. F. HATCH, IONA, MICH.

“A contractor’s view of prison discipline.”

JOSEPH F. SCOTT, WARDEN MASSACHUSETTS STATE REFORMATORY,

Spoke of “Civil service in Prison.”

A deplorable evil was the constant changes in prison management for political reasons, it was an evil which had to be eliminated. Mentioned several instances, where prisons were entirely under civil service rule with very satisfactory results.

Recreation and privileges as aid to prison discipline was freely and favorably discussed.

The food problem in prisons was discussed. This being a wardens’ meeting, the wardens of almost every penitentiary in the country (including our warden of the Eastern Penitentiary) told briefly what food was given to the inmates of their prison. The cost ranged from 7-1/2 cents to 10 cents for each prisoner, average was 9 cents.

It was also agreed that a prison orchestra could do much good in a prison. A music hour was also advocated, during which every prisoner should be allowed to play whatever instrument he chose in his cell.

George Scheidler, warden of Northern Indiana State Prison, said he had found that the improvement of prison food had done much to establish confidence between prisoners and officials. He said Indiana supplied food baked, roasted, stewed, etc., and that the menu is changed every day.

MONDAY AFTERNOON.

THE CHAPLAIN’S MEETING, 2 P. M.

A meeting which at times waxed warm. One of the subjects for discussion was Dr. McKim’s recent book, “Heredity and Human Progress.” The consensus of opinion among the chaplains was that the cause of crime is not psychological, as Dr. McKim tries to prove, but sociological, and it behooves the churches especially to try not only to improve the environments of the prisoners and ex-convicts, but to study more closely the cause of crime.

ADDRESS. REV. WM. J. BATT, CHAPLAIN, CONCORD, MASS.

He reviewed the past work of the Chaplains’ Association, and said: “That as they looked back he certainly felt very much had been gained from the existence of this organization,” and that much more could be done to aid the wardens and superintendents in the management of prisons and reformatories. That criminality was not on the increase, being lessened by public education, beginning in our public schools, where there has been no backward step in the matter of discipline and study of civil government.

To-day the cry is: “Use the preventative in the case of the discharged prisoner.” Yes, but what is needed is to use the preventative “education” at all times before he has cause to enter a prison gate.

The value of the parole, and possibly of the indeterminate sentence when enthroned, requires that in person you lend a helping hand to such a man to uplift him to better ways. The highest realization of our hopes in this world we shall never see, when all the gloomy enclosures of prison walls stand empty. Let there be earnest courage to walk and work by the light now shining about us, for the Light of the world is Jesus Christ.

CHAPLAIN WM. A. LOCKE, MANSFIELD, OHIO, READ A PAPER ON

“Prison Methods; Formative and Reformative.”

Crime is very largely due to poverty, or rather to what he called misdirected energy, both of mind and soul, and is a problem in sociology to direct activities from abnormal into normal channels. He dwelt much on prison discipline as of the greatest importance, and could not be too exacting, but that whatever methods might be employed, no violence should be done to the man within the man; that punishment should always be reformative. He spoke of the prisoner as a social iconoclast, who had lost his ambition, his help, and who sought to destroy what other men cherish. “It is the object of the prison to teach such a personal respect for social obligations, that nothing belongs to anyone except what he has gained by his brawn or his brains.” He touched on the evils of saloons, and said: “Through the doors of saloons to the prison doors pass one-half of the prisoners in this State.”

PRACTICAL PRISON REFORM.

CHAPLAIN D. R. IMBRIE, HOBOKEN, PA.

A paper on “A Decade of Prison Reform: The Realized and the Unrealized.” Among other things he said: “What is society? It is an individual, of which the members are individuals. It is one in interest, one in object, one in benefit, with the individual its factor. Its laws are the laws of God, and it strives to keep the letter of the law (but not always the spirit), but one thing is lacking—an all-powerful, soul-filling charity. It is the object of public philanthropy, of sociologists, of reformers in general, of this Prison Congress, to bring to the social world a realization of the eleventh commandment—to love thy neighbor as thyself.

A very able paper was read by Rev. Dr. F. A. Gold, of Mansfield, Ohio, on “The Chaplain’s Work from a Pastor’s Point of View,” which recommended co-operative work of religious and semi-religious associations as helpers.

Rev. Dr. H. H. Hart, of Chicago, criticized the paper, about delegates sent from the Y. M. C. A. and W. C. T. U.; the young clergy and Brotherhood men visiting prisons for the purpose of reforming prisoners, he claimed that very many were not real themselves, and we could not look for any success.

Rev. David J. Starr, Chaplain of Ohio State Penitentiary, in answering Mr. Hart said, that to find instances where actual injury was done by preaching, one need not go to the prisons, we see it on the outside, at revival meetings and other places. However that should not discourage any one from trying to induce men to lead better lives through the Gospel of Christ. What we need is less preaching and more hard work of sympathy.

Hon. Frederick Howard Wines, LL.D., of Washington, D. C., spoke about the recent book by Dr. McKim, “Heredity and Human Progress.” The drastic remedies of crime, are they Christian? He personally considered it not worthy of being chosen as a special topic of the Association. The fundamental weakness of Dr. McKim’s position is his preconceived notions. Let each one look that book over, you are not likely to read it all.

Chaplain J. F. Orwick, Jackson, Mich., read a paper about the observance of Prison Sunday (the fourth Sunday in October). He lamented that in so few churches it was observed, except in Chicago, where 300 sermons were preached last year.

Oren C. Painter, Treasurer of The Prisoners Aid Association, Baltimore, Md., spoke of their annual report, that last year 1,577 men and women were discharged from Baltimore Prison; and that they aided 564 discharged prisoners, furnished 4,644 meals and 1,502 night’s lodgings to men and women.

Mrs. Deborah C. Leeds made some brief remarks about reform.

Professor Charles R. Henderson, Chicago, claimed that if the people did not wake up and realize the necessity to reform themselves, how shall we expect to reform other men and women of like nature.

MONDAY, EVENING, SEPTEMBER 24TH.

ADDRESS—HON. SAMUEL J. BARROWS, MEMBER INTERNATIONAL PENITENTIARY COMMISSION, “THE INTERNATIONAL PENITENTIARY CONGRESS” BRUSSELS, BELGIUM, LAST YEAR.

The remarks were of great value to people interested in prison work and the care of prisoners. He made comparison between the management of prisons in this country, and some of the European countries, mentioning incidentally that in some of the prisons of Europe, methods were in vogue which were no longer thought of in this country.

He outlined briefly the mode of work of the Congress and gave interesting details of the reforms and improvement brought about through the influence of this commission.

The Congress at Brussels, 1899, had about 90 official delegates, representing 29 different countries; and 247 visitors from other countries who came for information.

He mentioned that the unification and expansion tendency of nationality might tend very largely to a healthy interchange of ideas, as the records of this Congress are made the property of the whole world by translation. States most progressive are those who confer in the general interests of life. He spoke of John Howard and his influence in all the world, and especially in England.

Dr. F. H. Wines was sent by the United States Government to meet and exchange ideas and experiences with other countries; he was not the first to suggest the organization of an International Congress, this was suggested by private men, several years previous.

“How to preserve the continuance of this Congress, each country promised a permanent commissioner. The United States failed to make such an appointment. Dr. Wines has the appointment from time to time only, but our government is now about to take it up again and resume its former responsibility. In this the United States will be fully able to take its part.

“At these international meetings no papers are read, all the papers are printed before the meetings, they are translated in different languages; then each country, answers the matter clearly in discussion, questions on reports, &c. Last year the United States was not officially represented on the commission, and the Delegates did not feel comfortable. All members are supposed to make themselves familiar with the papers on the programme before they come up. Sometimes there are too many questions to discuss properly. And even in our own country it is impossible to get some details, to give a proper answer; for instance, the United States Commissioners’ duties touching the Criminal Insane. It was very hard to get the facts from States, for there were so few that had any central bureau of information, it took the Government a long time to get any from a positive source.

“Penological questions were answered by monograph reports, such as relation of crimes to misdemeanor in the United States; reports to show the penalty and charges; result of the combined work was one of great value, for one cannot go to Paris or elsewhere to the meeting—to know that his contribution will be translated.

“He spoke of the United States Reformatory statistics being deficient, and of the prison management of the cellular or separate system in the United States department as very meagre, and now almost abandoned in the United States, and yet almost wholly installed in every country, and new prisons now building throughout Europe, with a system of centralization suggested by the State of New York, but while New York State prisoners share in the earning, all Europe is to the contrary.

“After thirty years of fraternal conference at these Association meetings, is there anything we can agree upon as principles, to lay down and not regret the cellular system? The whole matter of child-saving was conservative, but it layed on the fact of education. Alcoholism should be banished, the army canteen, etc. France strenuously opposed it. Throughout all Europe you see the influence of John Howard and Dr. Wines. England has taken prisons entirely out of politics, and the criminal insane is treated from a medical standpoint. Most of Europe has adopted the Bertillon system, and only a very small part of the United States, as yet.

“Of labor, there is no difference in any country, and good behavior earns a shortened sentence. In the United States, twenty States have adopted this rebate of sentence, seventeen the parole system in whole or in part, six an indeterminate sentence in part. Transportation as a punishment in Russia has been given up. The United States had the honor to start this International Congress, which has been continued by other countries, and now the United States again agrees to do her part by appointment. Personal intercourse and association is the bond of brotherhood inspiration.”

ADDRESS—HON. C. V. COLLINS, SUPT. N. Y. STATE PRISONS.

“Education as an Element of Reform Among Criminals.”

“The course of education, training and discipline in a penal institution should be one that would stimulate, develop and strengthen the criminal physically, mentally and morally—one that will show and impress upon him the folly and personal loss of defying the laws, and becoming an outcast, and that will lead him to understand, and therefore to desire the benefits that honesty, sobriety, industry and thrift will afford him; that is, to aim to create in him a desire for, and abhorrence of, the associations, the conditions and penalties of a criminal life, and instil into him a respect and desire for the associations, conditions and regards of an upright life. The ideal penal institutions should combine with elementary mental training and the functions of a sanitarium, a reformatory and an industrial school.

“In order that the State may attain more satisfactory results in its efforts to educate its criminals into good citizens and diminish the number of this class, I deem it necessary that the methods followed in the several classes of penal institutions to have close relation one to the other; this can only be brought about by adopting a general plan of administration, whereby the State shall take charge of all places for the detention of criminals, and shall control them through a central directing head, thus locating the responsibility, and by the inauguration of a comprehensive and systematical system of labor and discipline to insure a continuity of correctional and educational training that may easily be made productive in material results and in salutary influence on the prisoners.”

Mr. Collins indicated, that for first offender criminals, the State had a fixed standard of criminality and punishments, but that the State either feebly enforced it, or refused to establish it.

Our object is, or should be one that would strengthen and uplift the prisoner, to utilize all the conditions of whatever uprightness there was in him, by Christian teaching, industrial education, good dietary, baths, shops, cells, etc., in fact, physical and spiritual training. Every prison needs one or more dentist and oculist, we need many for our 4,300 convicts. Some of the convicts are credited with small earnings, received when they go out. The number of the illiterate is less than ten per cent. We need auxiliary helps to give employment.

In Sing Sing there is a bi-weekly paper, contributed, edited and printed exclusively by State’s prisoners, it has a great educational influence, called “Star of Hope.” At the Paris Exposition, it so impressed the leaders in France that they have decided to adopt it. A parole under proper restrictions is what is hoped for; idleness is the general cause of all county jails. Now if you will only rescue all classes, say for even less than a year, by proper parole, there is no telling how much progress we can make.

Don’t put the old offender and the first offender together; the third or more term men should be cellular. A general plan of administration with a central head of government in charge of all the condemned of the State (like the Bertillon Bureau) is to be desired everywhere.

ADDRESS.

PROFESSOR CHARLES R. HENDERSON, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO.

“The Sociological Side of Prison Reform.”

He made special reference to the Bertillon system of classifying types of criminals. This Government has already established schools of sociology and hygiene at several different penal institutions. As chairman of a committee appointed by the last Congress to inquire into the advisability of establishing laboratories for the scientific study of prisoners, made a report.

SCIENTIFIC CRIMINAL STUDY.

In it was recommended the experimental establishment of laboratories in selected institutions for the study of the physical, psychological, and social facts of criminal life and nature, such laboratories to be in charge of experts under the control of superintendents. What is proposed for prisons and reformatories is a laboratory conducted by a specialist for the scientific study of prison populations, with special reference at first to obvious practical needs of the administration in the discipline and training of prisoners.

The studies would be (1st) Physical: the anatomy and physiology of prisoners, measurements of sensations, and other mental manipulations, and the heredity of the prisoners; (2nd) Psychological: the mental, emotional, and voluntary life; the tastes, ideas, knowledge, motions, etc.; (3rd) Social: the domestic, industrial, neighborhood, legal, political, and religious environment and culture.

The committee was continued—directed to gather more information for next year; also urged to interest the Attorney General of the United States with the view to establish a laboratory by the National Government at the Government prison.

TUESDAY MORNING, SEPTEMBER 24TH.

“Criminal Law Reform.”

Judge Martin Dewey Follet, of Marietta, Ohio, gave a brief synopsis of the report (which was not read).

REPORT ON “PREVENTATIVE AND REFORMATORY WORK,” GEORGE TORRANCE, PONTIAC, ILL., SUPERINTENDENT STATE REFORMATORY.

It was his personal views, and not those of the committee. Nearly the whole morning was taken up in its discussion. This was the first time figures were even given based on the actual investigation of the cause of crime.

On the matter of heredity and environment, he said in part: “I have no hesitation in saying that at least 85 per cent. of all men and boys who have committed crime, if taken charge of in time and subjected to proper treatment, will become good citizens.” IF physicians and professors who believe that heredity is the direct cause of crime is true, then it cannot be done, but their theory is not correct, nor

FOUNDED ON FACTS.

It is true unquestionably, that there are hereditary criminals, but they constitute a very small per cent. of the whole number. For the purpose of putting this controversy to the test of facts, I have had an investigation made of the record and family history, so far as the commission of crime is concerned. Of 1,000 boys admitted to the Illinois State Reformatory, between Oct. 26, 1897 and Oct. 23, 1898, these figures would be substantially true of any other thousand, as they are taken consecutively; and were from the city, villages and farm.

Of this number there were 71 brothers, 3 sisters, 17 fathers and 2 mothers, who had been convicted of violation of the law, 20 for disorderly conduct only, for which they were fined. The others had workhouse, jail, reformatory, or penitentiary sentences. Forty of these were cases in which there were two in one family, thus the 40 represented 20 families. This leaves a total of 73 families represented, making a little over seven per cent. with criminal inclinations traceable to heredity.

The others admitted came from families of which all the other members were law-abiding citizens. It may be said heredity might affect the boy, and yet the remainder of the family do well. Conceding this to be so, and probably is, in some cases, it would not add more to the per cent. given, than would be subtracted by withdrawing from it the families in which two members had committed a crime where heredity was not the cause.

Considering 10 per cent. of the criminal class to be such because of heredity—(that is a liberal estimate) 90 per cent. must be accounted for in some other way. Ninety per cent. of the young convicted of crimes, would not become criminals with proper surroundings, proper companions, and proper attention.

He claimed that all severe punishment must be abolished in reformatories, else they may as well be extinct; he believed in the indeterminate sentence and

THE PAROLE LAWS.

“They are necessary to the effectual work in the reformatory. They furnish the lever, with which to maintain discipline.” In the indeterminate sentence and the parole of the reformatory, the prisoner will succeed when he finds that he can pass the examinations if he lives up to the proper requirements. The length of time for a cure is uncertain, it may be a year or two. Under the indeterminate sentence they serve longer, than under the determinate! We all know that in court when his case is heard, the sympathy of the jury is almost always with the first offender.

A good citizen is not an expense to the State, and the proverb “Once a criminal always a criminal,” is not true, for they can and are reformed. Crime is not on the increase, and the reform educational system is appreciated by the people, while the court only fixes the penalty. Idleness increases the troubles in our land, and the Gospel of our Saviour should be the study of the human race. There was a long discussion on his paper, principally about the heredity cause.

H. E. ALLISON, M. D., STATE HOSPITAL FOR CRIMINAL INSANE, MATTAWAN, N. Y., FISHKILL-ON-HUDSON,

Spoke of “Preventative Heredity of Crime.” He considered 10 per cent. a very strong factor. They had received at the Asylum 175 twelve-year-old boys from the Elmira Reformatory. But this does not agree with Mr. Torrance, but there might be a larger percentage in a little older growth.

There has been great progress in the care and treatment of the insane. Our population now (Sept, 1900,) is 765 in N. Y. State Asylum, Mattawan; and soon we will need two institutions, for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd term insane must be classified. In a short time we shall have from 1,200 to 1,500, as they are to be taken from all the institutions of the State that they may have proper treatment as well as reform. The life men in the New York prisons is 25 per cent. of the prison roll, and we need two institutions, one for the convict insane, and one for the insane, charged with crime. We have now over 300 detained after the expiration of their term.

T. J. CHARLTON, SUPT. REFORMATORY SCHOOL FOR BOYS, PLAINFIELD, INDIANA,

Spoke of the commitments on the charge of heredity, as being so few in that State, less than three per cent.

CAPTAIN C. S. TREMBY, U. S. N.,

Spoke of the discipline, etc., in the Spanish war, and especially at Santiago, of the extreme kindness in the discipline to the Spanish prisoners. The naval discipline seemed to him of a much better class and showed better work.

In the U. S. Naval Prison there is one-third time off for good behavior. This went into effect by direction of the court.

MRS. FRANCES A. MORTON, SUPT. REFORMATORY FOR WOMEN, SOUTH FARMINGTON, MASS.,

Spoke of the needs of elementary practice in education—that at Sherbourne Reformatory for Women, all the holidays’ recreations have been cut off for the want of education, viz.: 22nd of February, only eight of 200 women could tell why the day was observed, and only nine could tell why the 4th of July was kept. Since the death of Mrs. Johnson, one has not arisen to take her place so fully. Any rebellious woman is now put out of sight, not allowed to associate with the rest. Sewing-schools, housekeeping, &c., are for their moral elevation.

ADDRESS.

REV. AUGUST DRAHMS, CHAPLAIN STATE PRISON, SAN QUENTIN, CALIFORNIA.

“Increase and Decrease of Crime in Civilized Countries.”

He showed that crime in England decreased 35 per cent. in 16 years, and now it is but two and a half per cent. of the population. Juvenile decrease in Reformatory was 22 per cent. less. Scotland 8 per cent. less. United States last 7 years raised 1-44/100 per cent. Russia 32 per cent. decrease in 10 years. Austria 2 per cent. decrease in 6 years, Hungary less. Sweden less in serious offences by 30 per cent. in 10 years, Norway less. Netherlands falling off in prison offences, but much increased in 11 years to 35 per cent. Russia was 6,000, now 2,100, Japan less. France is foremost, decreased one-third in the past period, by 46,000 or 31 per cent. in all her prisons. In 1896 there were but 15,100 prisoners. Estimate of all in prison throughout the world in 1890 is 263,500.

Hon. Frederick H. Wines, LL.D., Washington, D. C., spoke of the increase and decrease of crime in civilized countries which caused much discussion; as he is the Assistant Director of the United States Census, he expressed his great admiration of the paper read by Chaplain Drahms, and its optimistic view; but he said you make a great mistake when information is based on the increase from the United States Census, for the prison census prior to 1880 is worthless, they were not taken, and the estimates were made by those in authority in my office. The census of 1890 was made particularly by the officers, and 1900 will certainly show a marked decrease of crime.

NEXT CONGRESS MEETING PLACE.

Invitations were extended by the following cities—Philadelphia, Detroit, Chattanooga, Kansas City, Cincinnati, Niagara Falls. The Delegate Committee met after adjournment and decided on Kansas City.

ENTERTAINMENT OF THE CONGRESS.

This afternoon at two o’clock, all met at the hotel for a drive; forty open carriages, drags, tally-hos, &c., with teams varying from two to five horses, were provided by the gentlemen of the city, very elegant turnouts; and all were taken to the Garfield Monument, thence through the park to the lake front, returned about seven o’clock. On the way all were refreshed in the park with lemonade. The drive was greatly enjoyed by all, as we were taken through the finest parts of the city, and saw the bright side.

TUESDAY EVENING.

Dr. J. F. Gilmore, Warden Central Prison, Toronto, Canada, invited the Congress to a meeting to be held Thursday, Sept. 27th, at Toronto in behalf of the Charities and Correction of Canada.

W. E. Shefton, Supt. of the Ohio Reformatory, at Mansfield, invited the Congress to visit that institution before they returned home.

JOSÉ F. GODOY, FIRST SECRETARY OF THE MEXICAN EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, D. C.,

Spoke of its prisons; they were partially after our cellular plan, partly under the State government, and partly by private enterprise in the lesser misdemeanors. That the prison officials were required to keep a very minute description of every man, and that they were treated morally and physically according as the several cases required, that there was no absolute settled plan, that every man should be treated alike, as in most of the United States, but that there was a tendency in that direction.

ADDRESS, HON. EUGENE SMITH, NEW YORK CITY.

“The Cost of Crime.”

It was very comprehensive, and the figures quoted giving the estimates and cost of crime, especially in large cities were astonishing. Mr. Smith held that municipal and county taxation was very largely due to crime; that there was hardly any taxation, federal, State, county or municipal, but what could be greatly reduced except for the existence of crime.

In order to come to some definite conclusion as to the cost, Mr. Smith quoted statistics from representative cities, New York, Cleveland, Chicago, St. Louis, San Francisco, Richmond, Charleston, and New Orleans.

SOME STARTLING FIGURES.

New York, during the year 1899, paid from the public treasury for items wholly due to crime the sum of $12,988,804. Then he mentioned many other expenditures which were partly chargeable to crime aggregating $7,889,259, making a total of $20,778,083. In comparing these figures with the population of New York, Mr. Smith concluded that crime in the American metropolis cost the people about $6 per capita annually. In San Francisco it ran about $5 per capita, and in other cities mentioned from $3 to $3.50 per capita. The excess in New York and San Francisco, was partly explained from the fact, that the figures quoted included county taxation.

The speaker then gave comprehensive statements, from which he gathered conclusions as to the cost of crime in the rural districts, adding that a very conservative estimate would be $1.00 per capita per year. Estimating that the present population of the country was 75,000,000 and that 40 per cent. lived in cities of above 8,000 inhabitants, he placed the total cost of crime at $150,000,000 per year. To this he added $50,000,000 from federal and State taxes, making the total $200,000,000 per year.

These figures, said Mr. Smith, inaccurate as they may seem to be, prove that crime is by far the largest factor with which political economy has to deal. The only other item of expense that comes near to it is the maintainance of the public schools, which for the same year aggregate about $139,000,000. But the enormous expenditure mentioned is only for the prevention of crime.

The city of New York expends each year an enormous sum for maintaining its fire department, but that is not the only expense caused through the existence of fires. No possible statistics can be compiled to give an estimate for the cost of property stolen and the suffering caused by crime.

These facts are real, not estimated.

THE AVERAGE STEAL.

To obtain an estimate of this cost, however, the speaker said that $1,600 per year was the amount of money stolen by the average habitual criminal, and it was certainly a conservative estimate; there were at present 100,000 prisoners in confinement, of whom 40 or 50 per cent. were habitual; but this did not represent the cost of drunkenness which, he said, is generally crime in its most debased form, nor the cost of crime which was never detected. Adding up all these items of expense chargeable to crime, the speaker produced the enormous sum of $600,000,000 per year, which, he said, exceeded the value of the cotton or wheat crop. Any help for the future must come by regenerating the people by Christianity.

JOSEPH F. SCOTT, SUPERINTENDENT MASSACHUSETTS REFORMATORY,

offered a resolution, the substance of which was: That this Prison Association endorse the “Indeterminate sentence law system, and recommend that the various States adopt it as part of their criminal jurisprudence.”

There was considerable discussion, and it was referred to a committee to report at the closing session.

The Committee on Place for holding the next Congress reported that they had selected Kansas City for September, 1901, and that Philadelphia had made a bold fight for it. It was voted by the Congress to accept the report of the committee, and made it unanimous.

A resolution was passed, as a matter of testimonial of past duties to Mr. Z. R. Brockway, who had resigned the charge of Elmira Reformatory, N. Y.

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26TH, A. M.—CHAPLAINS’ MEETING.

Beside routine work, reference was made to Dr. McKim’s book. Chaplain Batt spoke of the “Exaggerated value set upon human life,” page 185. “Plans innumerable devised but all fail,” “and that literature of the Congress is not such as is desirable for the betterment of the prisoners, so that it rests mostly with the chaplains.”

J. WARREN MEADE, WARDEN AUBURN STATE PRISON, N. Y.,

Spoke of prison discipline. Best way to reach a man’s heart was through his stomach. That it was very necessary to give attention to the appointment of the officers, in order to impress the men with a care and cleanliness. The criminal should have a time to sing if he chose, and should be assisted in fitting himself for life-work in the world.

The dungeon cells are sufficient punishment for any infraction without resorting to a paddle. Said he could not imagine how Massachusetts could have a fixed commutation for life sentences, except they use the Life Ins. Co.‘s approximate longevity table, like age 34 to serve 25 years, age 40 to serve 16 years, and so on. Good discipline has the effect to remove criminal desires.

Both T. E. Ellison, Fort Wayne, Ind., and Gen. R. Brinkerhoff, of Ohio, remarked that the wardens and superintendents summoned daily the overseers, guards, etc., to discuss the wants, needs, and peculiarities of convicts, in order to be in touch of all his employees, and to the prisoners by the overseers.

MEMORIAL TRIBUTE

Was recorded on the death of Michael J. Cassidy, Phila., Pa.; Joseph Nicholson, Detroit, Mich.; Mr. Yale, California, members of the Association.

WILLIAM CHAMBERLAIN, warden State Prison, Jackson, Mich., spoke of discipline in his State Penitentiary, that the conditions were laid down by the State Board of Control. The law governing penitentiary officers, wardens and chaplains, is that they become acquainted with the inner life of the prisoner, and there is a desire on the part of the men to conform to the rules. There are always some incorrigibles. We have a system of graded schools, and graded prisoners. Four and a half hours a week for discipline of prisoners, the officers become acquainted with the natural abilities of the prisoner, and are able to report fully to the warden. There are two ways of governing the man, Force or Persuasion, the latter, the best of all, if it succeeds.

Life terms in Colorado average less than 9 years, longest term is 16 years. There are now 160 life terms.

Chaplain Batt thought we ought not to use the words “Criminal and Convict”; in Massachusetts it was never used, but “Prisoners and Men”; never inmates, they hated to be called inmates.

Many of the wardens claimed it impossible to hold any conference daily with employees. At Concord, Mass., Reformatory they meet at 5.30 P. M. daily. Chaplain Batt spoke of heads of prisons summoning employees for detail work, and referred to the report of Commodore Nelson summoning all his officers to his ship, to make ready for the battle; the battle was really fought in the cabin of his own flagship.

C. P. HOYT, WARDEN, BUENA, COLORADO,

Said corporal punishment if judiciously used, is really the best mode of punishment and that there should be but one grade only in the same prison. When a man does well, give him a ticket of parole.

J. WARREN BAILY, MASSACHUSETTS,

Spoke about discharged prisoners, what shall be done with them, how shall he be aided, and how long? Best way, to seek some employment or trade for him on his discharge. Aid should begin when he enters the prison gate and continue till he goes out. (Reference was made to the Penna. Prison Journal “At the Prison Gate.”) No person should be discharged a citizen, but paroled for a time, with continuous oversight. What we need is graded reformatories, with three grades, place him in the second, and he can work up to the first, or drop back to the third, and then has to work up to the first before he can be paroled. Spoke of the need of well-managed prisons and reformatories, where vast numbers had gone through the three grades and come out good citizens.

OREN C. PAINTER, OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND,

Read a paper about The Prisoners’ Aid Association of Baltimore.

AMOS W. BUTLER, IND., SEC’TY BOARD STATE CHARITIES,

Spoke of the State parole that out of 717 paroled, places were found for all but 3, one blind, one cripple, one insane; of this number, 12 failed to report monthly; 9 were returned to the reformatory. No man is released except for the maximum time, and the oversight is continued until the time is completed.

CONNECTICUT REQUIRES

That thirty days before the prisoner goes out, he shall be seen by the committee on discharged prisoners, furnished food and board for a time, and work; that there has not in five years, in that reformatory, been a single infringement. It turned out that out of 100, only 18 had been paroled in five years.

Report of Committee on Mr. Scott’s resolution. Specific action was deferred till next year. Only passed the sentiment or voice of the Congress “in favor of immediate sentences.”

WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON, CLOSING SESSION.

Professor R. G. Henderson read a paper on Psychological Laboratory in Prisons. Recommended that one be established, to try it.

Physical.

Psychological.

Sociological.

Anatomy, heredity, physiology, mental.

Knowledge, emotion, mental tastes, ideas.

Legal, political, religious, domestic, industrial environment, culture.

Dr. Wines remarked, “I am not an anti-penologist, have no opinions to enforce. In the United States census there is opportunity to examine all the matter concerning prisoners. Each prison and reformatory was furnished with a complete case, to study fully before reply, and if the wardens also help give it, a more correct record can be made, and the Government take up all the matter, furnish the apparatus and the men to do the work.”

Mrs. Deborah C. Leeds suggested a vote of recommendation of the Congress, that a “woman’s prison or reformatory” be established in every State, passed.

COMPLIMENTARY RESOLUTIONS TO

The Local Committee and the Young Men’s Christian Association for the delightful carriage ride, the newspapers, the Street Railway Company, the Old Stone Church, Rev. W. D. Pickard, D.D., for his admirable sermon, and Dr. S. B. Barrows for his paper on criminal law, were passed by a rising vote.

It was stated that in Indiana Industrial School for Girls each one was kept separate, or cellular. In Massachusetts women are sent to jail, then to a reformatory, but if convicted more than twice are sent to prison.

Rev. Dr. Pickard made some brief remarks, also Professor Henderson, and the Congress closed with singing the Doxology and Benediction, 5 P. M., Sept. 26, 1900.

Next Congress, Kansas City, 1901.

The above report was read at a meeting of the Pennsylvania Prison Society, October 18, 1900. It was directed “that it be printed in the Journal of 1901.”

MRS. DEBORAH C. LEEDS,

JOHN J. LYTLE,

REV. R. HEBER BARNES, Sec. Com.

Pennsylvania Official Delegates at Large from the Society.

TREASURER’S REPORT.

GEORGE W. HALL, Treasurer,

IN ACCOUNT WITH

THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY.

1900.

DR.

January

1.—

To

Balance

$ 670 94

“

Income from Investments

1,658 86

“

Contributions and Membership

402 00

“

Interest on Deposits

19 36

“

Printing the Journal

16 00

“

Special, for Discharged Prisoners, Eastern Penitentiary

3,675 62

“

I. V. Williamson Estate

468 00

“

Income C. S. Williams Estate (In trust)

81 00

“

Life Memberships

40 00

$7,031 78

1900.

CR.

Dec.

31.—

By

Discharged Prisoners, Eastern Penitentiary

$2,139 03

“

Salary John J. Lytle as General Secretary

1,000 00

“

Discharged Prisoners, County Prison

675 00

“

Salary Fred’k J. Pooley, County Prison Agent

750 00

“

F. J. Pooley, special (extra service E. P.)

50 00

“

C. S. Williams Estate to Home of Industry

81 00

“

Janitor, fuel, library

127 99

“

Repair of office and stationery

402 34

“

J. J. Lytle, Prison Agent, Eastern Penitentiary

500 00

“

Printing 5,000 Journals, mailing, etc.

421 53

“

Balance, (and “Barton fund” $176.71)

884 89

$7,031 78

We have examined the vouchers for 1900, and find the cash balance $884.89, and of the Barton fund $176.71. Also the securities, bonds and mortgages, certificates, trust deposits, title and fire insurance policies, were examined and found correct.

CHARLES M. MORTON,

R. HEBER BARNES,

LINDLEY H. BEDELL,

Auditing Committee.

PHILADELPHIA, Feb. 1, 1901.

DONATIONS RECEIVED

Since April 1st, 1900, to February 28th, 1901.

Mrs. M. Lloyd

$2 00

Rev. James Shrigley

2 00

Prof. Joseph P. Remington

5 00

George Kramer

1 00

S. Bartram Richards

5 00

Mrs. E. L. Metzgar

3 00

Gertrude Craig Roberts

3 00

Mary P. F. Oberteuffer

3 00

W. D. Mason

5 00

M. S. L. Rhoads

2 00

Samuel S. White, Jr.

5 00

Mary Evre Howell

10 00

L. D. Lovett, 1899-1900

20 00

Richard Randolph, M. D.

1 00

Mary Randolph

1 00

Mrs. Frederick Prime

2 00

Miss Thomson

5 00

Francis A. North

5 00

Julia D. Stroud

10 00

Mrs. L. S. Ladd

5 00

Joshua L. Baily

5 00

E. Hagert

5 00

E. W. Clark

10 00

John Bley

5 00

Peter M. Landis

2 00

Samuel Disston

5 00

Mrs. A. F. Miller

1 00

R. Metzgar & Son

2 00

Mrs. N. T. Clapp

5 00

William S. Magee

5 00

George W. Marshall

2 00

E. M. Middleton

5 00

Cash

1 00

C. J. Marshall

1 00

M. L. Milligan

2 00

Emma C. Middleton

5 00

A. Miller

1 00

J. Vaughan Merrick, Jr.

1 00

John L. Mickle

2 00

Cash

1 00

Vincent McLaughlin

2 00

Mrs. Washington J. Landell

2 00

Levi Mattson

5 00

John Lambert, Jr.

5 00

Mrs. J. B. Townsend

5 00

Abby Newhall

5 00

Miss C. Manderson

1 00

Mrs. M. A. McCoy

2 00

G. H. Stoiber

5 00

Laura M. Stoiber

5 00

Augusta McFadden

1 00

Vincent P. McCulley

2 00

Henry F. Mangus

2 00

George Vaux, Jr

5 00

Cash

5 00

R. C. Shafges

1 00

J. Campbell Haywood

5 00

Thomas Mills

2 00

James McCurdy

5 00

Mrs. James M. Robb

5 00

Miss E. M. Maull

5 00

Anna E. Molloy

5 00

H. E. Niconel

2 00

McIllvaine Bros

5 00

Mrs. O. M. North

5 00

Joseph McDonald

2 00

A. Megonigle

5 00

Rev. Charles E. Milner

1 00

Chloe A. McCann

1 00

Watson M. Null

1 00

M. C. McCahan

2 00

Eliza Y. McAllister

2 00

Edward Pennock

2 00

J. E. Nidecker

2 00

Mrs. C. Watson McKeehan

5 00

Charles H. Reeves

2 00

Mrs. S. McKenney

2 00

Mrs. William Mencke

2 00

C. McClelland

2 00

Elwood Melcher

1 00

L. Mayer

2 00

H. Wolf

1 00

Thomas T. Nelson

5 00

Mrs. T. Turnbull

2 00

Mary McCullagh

5 00

Edward J. Newland

1 00

William T. Moffly

1 00

Jos. A. Heintzelman, M. D.

1 00

L. Ashton Louder

5 00

Mrs. F. B. Haft

5 00

Robert M. Holbrook

1 00

J. F. Holt, M. D.

1 00

R. Hey & Son

2 00

Robert C. Thomas

2 00

Cash

5 00

W. P. Henszey

5 00

J. F. Irons

1 00

Mrs. E. C. Idler

2 00

Adolph Hess

2 00

Rev. L. C. Hill

1 00

Samuel Hillman

1 00

Mrs. Sarah C. Hepburn

2 00

James C. Brooks

2 00

William Ivins

10 00

Jacob Y. Dietz

10 00

C. Hanford Henderson

5 00

Benjamin T. Herkness

5 00

John McClintock

3 00

Miss Lawrence

1 00

E. M. Hewish, M. D.

2 00

J. Lewis Kates

5 00

Jacob L. Hershy

1 00

Mrs. R. K. Wright, Sr.

2 00

Samuel P. Hiester

2 00

Cash

1 00

Robert J. Hess, M. D.

5 00

Nathaniel E. Janney

1 00

W. B. Jacobs

5 00

Daniel L. Hinckle

2 00

Cash

1 00

George F. Hoffman

5 00

John R. Ingham

1 00

Miss E. S. Wister

5 00

S. F. Hening

1 00

Mrs. E. J. Hortter

1 00

Miss H. A. Johnson

2 00

Charles P. Keith

5 00

Mrs. E. Jeffries

2 00

E. J. Kerrick

2 00

W. H. Kirkpatrick

5 00

Francis S. Keese

2 00

Mrs. John Jameson

2 00

F. E. Himmelwright, M. D.

5 00

Cash

2 00

E. E. Young

2 00

Mrs. E. Hodson

1 00

Miss R. Booth

1 00

Rev. E. Zartman

1 00

Morris A. Kaufman

2 00

Miss E. T. Zebley

1 00

S. M. Zacharas

2 00

Mrs. E. Clark

10 00

Samuel C. Perkins

5 00

Mrs. T. Charlton Henry

10 00

Charles F. Jenkins

5 00

W. E. Littleton

5 00

R. W. Downing, Jr.

5 00

Cash

5 00

W. H. Powell

5 00

John P. Mathieu

5 00

H. E. Brown

5 00

W. H. Jackson

5 00

Cash

2 00

Frederick V. Yeager

1 00

E. J. Johnson

1 00

Cash

1 00

F. W. Zoller

2 00

William G. Henry

1 00

Charles E. Ingersoll

5 00

A Friend

2 00

Andrew S. Jackson

5 00

H. C. Young

2 00

W. B. Keeler

5 00

Lewis A. Young

2 00

James P. Young

5 00

J. H. N.

1 00

Mrs. S. B. Yerkes

2 00

Mrs. Charles Heebner

5 00

Burnham, Williams & Co.

25 00

C. M. Twaddell

5 00

Thomas Hewson Bache, M. D.

2 00

Mrs. Matthew Semple

5 00

Alexander Peacock

1 00

Arthur G. Dixon

5 00

James S. Rogers

2 00

William E. Helme

5 00

Rev. R. C. Von Phul

5 00

W. J. McCahn, Jr.

5 00

H. C. Marland, M. D.

1 00

Pemberton Hollingsworth

5 00

J. Ogden Hoffman

5 00

Albert L. Baily

2 00

Edward Cress

1 00

Miss M. Hurst

20 00

Dr. George G. Wise

3 00

William H. Magoffin

5 00

Francis B. Reeves

2 00

Mrs. J. M. Rommel

2 00

Edward Comfort

5 00

W. H. Gilbert

2 00

W. P. Letchworth

2 00

Charles W. Merritt

1 00

Mrs. Walker G. Sibley

5 00

H. from a Friend

10 00

A. H. Old

3 00

Elizabeth W. Stephenson

20 00

Clara S. Young

5 00

Charles W. Henry

25 00

Mrs. John Gillespie

5 00

Auguston Thomas

5 00

Miss Edith Yarrow

1 00

J. Willis Martin

10 00

Mrs. Joseph Harrison

15 00

Asa S. Wing

10 00

Catharine M. Mullin

10 00

Louisa Alter

10 00

C. McNeely

10 00

Ellen B. A. Mitchener

10 00

George B. Bonnell

5 00

Mrs. Willing

30 00

C. P. B. Jeffries

10 00

Mrs. Bryant Ferguson

5 00

John E. Carter.

5 00

E. M. Fagan

5 00

Edward Brown

5 00

Mrs. J. H. Brazier

5 00

George Harrison Fisher

5 00

Mrs. W. H. Bacon

5 00

Mrs. J. Lewis Crozier

10 00

James W. Cooke & Co.

5 00

Joseph S. Elkinton

5 00

H. C. Cochran

5 00

R. Y. Filbert

5 00

Mrs. S. R. Fox

5 00

Henry C. Davis

5 00

Finley Acker

5 00

Priscilla A. Wright

25 00

Jay Cooke

5 00

Thomas N. Ely

5 00

Enoch Lewis

10 00

Mr. & Mrs R. W. Birdrell

5 00

Henry K. Wampole & Co.

5 00

Mrs. James Caldwell

1 00

Hannah F. Caldwell

5 00

L. H. Carpenter

3 00

Sarah B. Cadwalader

5 00

Cash

2 00

J. E. Challinger

5 00

J. G. Clark

3 00

James B. Chandler

5 00

Mrs. H. McK. Claxton

3 00

I. E. Chipley

2 00

W. P. Campbell

2 00

Murray Stewart Chism

1 00

Charles E. Cattell

2 00

Mrs. G. W. Dougherty

1 00

Mrs. V. B. Davis

2 00

Samuel Biddle

5 00

Mrs. George M. Converse

5 00

H. A. Wood

10 00

Samuel Christian

1 00

Bodine, Altemus & Co.

5 00

William P. Damon

2 50

Frank E. De Long

5 00

Mrs. M. S. Clement

1 00

A. M. Davis

3 00

Jacob L. Smith

10 00

Clarence H. Clark

5 00

Miss Jane Cooke

5 00

Mrs. P. W. DeCousey

5 00

Elizabeth Allen

2 00

Mary Branson, M. D.

1 00

Alexander E. Harvey

5 00

William Galloway

5 00

Mrs. Nathan H. Davis

5 00

Mrs. A. R. Clark

5 00

Charles A. Converse

2 00

Helena J. Blandner

1 00

C. N. Hutchinson

5 00

Dr. John B. Deaver

2 00

W. J. Graham

2 00

Mrs. W. D. Edson

1 00

Dr. Richard W. Deaver

2 00

Catharine Begley

1 00

B. F. Greenewald

5 00

Charles Comly

10 00

C. S. Childs

5 00

John B. Chaplin

5 00

Morris, Wheeler & Co.

10 00

W. Frekerick Snyder

5 00

Martha B. Earle

2 00

Charles Platt

5 00

Peter C. Moore

1 00

Mr. John P. Hubbard

3 00

Walter E. Hening

2 00

Murray & Wilson

1 00

Lukens & Whittington

1 00

Mrs. B. B. Comegys, Jr.

1 00

Edwin G. Dreer

5 00

Rev. E. T. McMullin

1 00

John Price

2 00

Mrs. John Klemm

2 00

James T. Shinn

2 00

Lewis R. Diek

2 00

Margaret W. Haines

5 00

Sarah W. Rhoads

2 00

H. K. Mulford Co.

5 00

Isaac Saller

1 00

Helen Hunter

1 00

Mrs. W. Mitchell

2 00

Julius G. Weygandtt

2 00

Charles Richardson

5 00

Mrs. M. M. Crawford

1 00

Horace G. Lippincott

2 00

William J. Earhart

5 00

Dr. Benjamin K. Fletcher

2 00

Mary S. Richards

5 00

Miss C. W. Burton

3 00

Mrs. Berwind

2 00

R. Francis Wood

10 00

Smith Harper

1 00

Edwin S. Johnston

1 00

Miss Ida V. Walraven

2 00

Mrs. Wm. P. Tatham

10 00

Joseph R. Smith

3 00

Thomas W. Sparks

5 00

Dr. C. N. Peirce

2 00

W. Kerr Shea, M. D.

1 00

James F. Magee

5 00

Louis Wolf

5 00

Arthur Malcolm

2 00

William S. Hallowell

2 00

Rebecca White

5 00

Mrs. Samuel S. White

5 00

George G. Williams

5 00

Joseph A. Sinn

2 00

William T. Murphy

2 00

A. Trimble

1 00

Elsie Wister Keith

10 00

Jones Unwiler

2 00

H. A. Mitchell

2 00

William Burnham

3 00

Charles Rhoads

5 00

Beulah M. Rhoads

5 00

Hon. Wm. N. Ashman

3 00

Dr. James Tyson

2 00

Anna H. Tierney

5 00

William Weightman

5 00

H. G. Tull

1 00

G. R. Rebman

2 00

W. L. Worcester

3 00

W. Graham Tyler

5 00

Louis Taws

5 00

Mrs. R. Porter

5 00

Mrs. Thos. S. Kirkbride

2 00

Rynear Williams, Jr.

5 00

Mrs. F. L. Smith

1 00

Mary G. Wilkinson

2 00

Cash

2 00

E. Aug. Miller

2 00

Edward A. Sibley

5 00

A. W. Wœbken

5 00

Barber & Perkin

1 00

Rev. George Van Dews

2 00

E. B. Warren

5 00

Frank H. Wyeth

5 00

George Ulrich

5 00

Charles W. Trotter

5 00

J. Runde Smith

10 00

Dr. W. C. Widmayer

1 00

E. W. & E. M. Wilkins

2 00

Craig Lippincott

5 00

John D. Groves, M. D.

5 00

John Simmons

1 00

Mrs. Wm. Simpson, Jr.

5 00

D. Sulzberger

2 00

Richard P. Mason

5 00

William M. Morrison

2 00

Cash

1 00

Bishop O. W. Whitaker

5 00

N. R. Denis

5 00

R. H. Eastburn

1 00

V. F. Campbell

1 00

Mrs. Gillies Dallett

2 00

H. Dercum

2 00

E. J. Lavina

2 00

William Evans, M. D.

1 00

William J. Latta

2 00

James G. Conway

1 00

James Spear

3 00

Henry F. Coates & Co.

5 00

Mrs. J. Manderson

5 00

Miss E. Bradford

3 00

Mrs. H. Howe

5 00

Mrs. W. C. Hadley

3 00

Elizabeth B. Garrett

3 00

Martha H. Garrett

3 00

Hetty B. Garrett

3 00

P. B. Welsh

2 00

G. H. Deacon

1 00

C. F. Wilson

5 00

S. Thanhauser

1 00

Cash

5 00

Barclay R. Leeds

5 00

A Friend

2 00

Mrs. R. S. Lawson

1 00

W. Sidebottom

5 00

Cash

1 00

Mary M. Edwards

2 00

Joseph S. Keen

5 00

E. W. Clark

10 00

Rev. Marvin J. Eckels

5 00

Helen B. Davids

2 00

Miss S. F. Cassidy

1 00

Evans R. Dick

5 00

A. Leberman

2 00

Milton C. Lazar

1 00

J. B. Faulkner

2 00

Mrs. D. M. Zimmerman

2 00

Rev. Charles F. Kavanagh

5 00

Miss Emily Campbell

2 00

R. A. Caskey

1 00

Cash

5 00

M. E. Twaddell

5 00

Strawbridge & Clothier

5 00

Anna M. Sterling

5 00

The Misses Glading

5 00

Mrs. J. S. Cox

2 00

Mrs. Hollingsworth Whyte

5 00

William C. Warren

3 00

Smith & Dreer

2 00

Emily M. Smyth

5 00

Morse, Williams & Co.

2 00

Jennie L. Powell

2 00

McCambridge & Co.

2 00

Anna Kaign Smith

5 00

Anna M. Gumpert

2 00

Fred W. Herman

2 00

Joseph Hill Brinton

2 00

Wood Gilpin

2 00

Miss Mattie Landis

3 00

Lettitia P. Collins

5 00

Bishop C. D. Foss

3 00

Mrs. William Waterall

2 00

N. Snellenburg & Co.

5 00

David Teller

2 00

Thomas E. Gaskill

5 00

Mrs. B. M. Plummer

1 00

Elizabeth D. Banes

1 00

Mrs. C. A. Wentz

5 00

A. W. Wisler

1 00

Edmund Willits

1 00

E. K. Shelmerdine

5 00

Herbert B. Loeb

1 00

John Lloyd

2 00

J. Bertram Lippincott

5 00

J. H. Ellis

2 00

Joseph W. Lippincott

1 00

Mrs. S. H. Fay

5 00

John P. P. Lathrop

2 00

Mrs. Aug. Lessig

2 00

Jacob D. Litt

5 00

Mrs. Charles E. Lex

2 00

James W. Lehman

1 00

Arno Leonhardt

2 00

Cash

1 00

George H. Cliff

1 00

Elizabeth W. Cooke

2 00

Master Harry D. Lentz, Jr.

1 00

Max B. Loeb

2 00

B. K. Locke

1 00

John A. Schulze

2 00

Frank R. Whiteside

2 00

Elizabeth N. Garrett

2 00

S. Harvey Thomas

2 00

Wilfred Lewis

1 00

Isabel A. deSchwintz

2 50

Samuel J. Levy

5 00

D. N. K. Schwenck

1 00

Mr. and Mrs. E. M. Zimmerman

2 00

Mrs. A. E. Campbell

1 00

S. Morris Lillie

3 00

John Tatum

2 00

W. Hinckle Smith

5 00

H. O. Wilbur

5 00

A. Alvarengo

1 00

Russell H. Johnson, Jr.

1 00

J. J. de Macedo, Jr.

1 00

Frank P. Gallagher

1 00

A. E. Gallagher

1 00

A. Lans

4 00

W. G. Rolph

2 00

Mrs. Charles M. Taylor, Jr.

5 00

Rev. J. A. Lippincott

3 00

Cash

2 00

Robert F. Innis

3 00

Ashton S. Tourison

2 00

James G. Thayer

2 00

Francis T. S. Dailey

10 00

Mr. and Mrs. Andrew San Alvarez

1 00

Miss Emma Parmalee

1 00

James E. Talley, M. D.

2 00

B. C. Tilghman

5 00

George Widener

2 00

H. M. Sharpless

1 00

Miss A. K. Selig

3 00

Mrs. Van Pelt

2 00

R. Greenwood

1 00

Charles C. Savage

15 00

H. M. Nathanson

5 00

William H. Thome

2 00

Henry Veit

2 00

Mrs. C. A. Topping

2 00

James Martin

2 00

Samuel J. Randall, Jr.

1 00

Horace E. Taylor

1 00

A. P. Townsend

1 00

William Wagner

1 00

S. Finley Thompson

5 00

Mrs. Joseph L. Tull

1 00

Mrs. E. C. Lewis

2 00

Mrs. Henry J. Walter

1 00

Harriet H. McClellan

2 00

Mrs. Mamie C. Stinson

5 00

Miss Sue E. Nagle

1 00

Henry M. Lewis

5 00

Cash

5 00

Miss C. S. Thompson

1 00

Cash

1 00

John G. Schall’s Sons

2 00

L. Harry Richards, Jr.

1 00

D. S. Acker

5 00

George W. Baily

5 00

Thomas P. Covington

2 00

Sarah E. Williams

2 00

Francis O. Alcott

5 00

William L. Allen

1 00

George Allen, Jr.

1 00

Rev. E. W. Appleton

5 00

E. W. Dunton

5 00

Louisa Gibbons Davis

2 00

Samuel Wolfe, M.D.

2 00

Charles F. Taylor, M.D.

5 00

Frank Teller

1 00

F. D. Abbott

1 00

Henry Jones

1 00

Mrs. George Childs Drexel

25 00

Charles A. Kurlbaum

2 00

Mrs. L. M. Anschutz

5 00

Paul E. Huneker

5 00

Oliver Hough

1 00

William G. Huey

1 00

G. A. Bisler

2 00

William A. Ingham

10 00

Max Kohn

2 00

Walter A. Bailey

2 00

Cash

1 00

Miss Lottie A. Arnold

2 00

Abraham M. Kohn

2 00

Frank K. Hipple

2 00

Harold Peirce

10 00

Mrs. Harold Peirce

10 00

William Fisher Lewis

5 00

S. Wertheimer

1 00

T. P. Huff

2 00

Hon. J. B. McPherson

3 00

Jane C. Selden

1 00

Edwin N. Benson

5 00

Elizabeth M. Wilgur

2 00

Francis Donaldson

2 00

G. H. Macauley

5 00

Mrs. Joseph Young

2 00

C. S. MacCain

2 00

Professor D. W. Howard

1 00

James P. Hutchinson

5 00

Mrs. Edward Baily

1 00

J. B. Lyman

1 00

Charles M. Fox, M.D.

5 00

Thomas A. Kershaw

1 00

Lawrence Johnson

5 00

W. W. Burr

2 00

Harry Godey

5 00

Elizabeth B. Sloan

1 00

Rev. William Bannard

1 00

Morris T. Knight

1 00

Azariah W. Hoopes

2 00

William Krause

2 00

T. McOwen

10 00

Rev. Joseph Krauskopt

5 00

Mrs. Morris Liveright

2 00

William MacLean, Jr.

3 00

Miss Gertrude Bartlett

1 00

Samuel P. Huhn

5 00

Theodore J. Lewis

3 00

Cash

3 00

J. B. Habecker

1 00

Cash

1 00

Mrs. Samuel Horner

2 00

R. W. Steel

5 00

Cash

5 00

J. G. Rosengarten

10 00

Cash

1 00

Cash

5 00

C. S. Warts

5 00

Lyman B. Hall

2 00

Mrs. Alexander Van Rennsalaer

50 00

Mrs. S. R. Wiggins

1 00

F. T. Bieber

1 00

Anne Thompson

10 00

John Jay Gilroy

2 00

A. H. Hulshiger

2 00

W. S. Kriehl

1 00

A. Petre

5 00

C. C. A. Baldi

2 00

Miss Husband

2 00

Mrs. Ingraham

2 00

Edward Batchelor

1 00

Z. Z. Howell

2 00

Cash

1 00

George W. Lynch, Jr.

2 00

Silena Patterson Hughes

5 00

Z. L. Howell

2 00

Mrs. M. D. Atkinson

2 00

A. W. Kelsey

10 00

Cash

1 00

Cash

1 00

George M. Junkin

10 00

Miss Anne Law Hubbell

1 00

Miss H. Hubbell

1 00

Mary J. Barr

1 00

Mrs. D. L. Hopper

1 00

Charles E. Milnor

2 00

John Hunsberger

1 00

Josephine R. Page

5 00

Mrs. W. Adger

2 00

Cash

1 00

James Barker

2 00

Charles H. Thompson

2 00

J. Bell Austin

2 00

Mrs. G. W. Buttnunth

2 00

William J. Jordan

1 00

Thomas H. B. Hull

10 00

Mrs. Reath

5 00

Peter Klein

2 00

Jesse Lukens

2 00

Francis Yarnall

1 00

Cash

2 00

Mrs. John Baird

5 00

Henrietta Louisa Exton

2 00

George N. Colket

5 00

D. Macfarlan, M. D.

1 00

W. W. Frazier

5 00

Rev. Charles Wood

5 00

Mrs. J. B. Levering

5 00

Mrs. John T. Lewis

1 00

Mary C. Greenough

10 00

William Ostrander

2 00

Franklin S. Horn

2 00

John J. Horn

2 00

Francis S. Williams

1 00

George Wood

5 00

Walter B. Smith

5 00

Professor B. S. Banks

1 00

Doctor & Mrs. Chas. H. Thomas

15 00

James S. McCain

1 00

S. E. R. Hassinger

2 00

Frank H. Ransom

5 00

James Hay

5 00

Ellen B. & Everett Stewart

5 00

Rev. James P. James

5 00

Mrs. Edward G. Sanger

3 00

Stuart Farren Smith

5 00

Sarah E. Neath

2 00

J. W. Hyzer

2 00

E. Allen

1 00

Moyer Fleisher

5 00

Mrs. James Boice

1 00

Emma T. Schreiner

3 00

M. B. Woodward

5 00

V. W. Walter

2 00

Mrs. Louise T. Simpson

3 00

Mary R. Fox

15 00

Hannah Fox

10 00

M. E. Addams

2 00

Mrs. S. A. Willoughby

2 00

Mrs. William F. North

2 00

Rev. Fleming James

2 00

Cash

1 00

Sarah E. Moore

2 00

Anna P. Stevenson

2 00

S. Pearley Howe

1 00

Walter Ross McShea

2 00

Samuel W. Barnes

1 00

William C. Rommell

1 00

B. S. H.

50 00

Robert K. McNeely

5 00

James H. Windrim

5 00

Miss M. K. Gibson

10 00

Miss Anna Frazier

5 00

D. Allen Knight

5 00

Cash

1 00

Cash

3 00

Charles B. Dunn

5 00

C. D. Barney

5 00

John H. Lewars

5 00

W. Brentwood Smith

5 00

Sarah Edythe Wister

5 00

John F. Craig

1 00

Edward Iredick

1 00

John J. Henry

5 00

William C. Lowry

5 00

Henry H. Collins

10 00

Fleming Park

1 00

John F. Palmer

2 00

John Reilly

5 00

Mrs. George W. Biddle

5 00

F. T. Fawcett

5 00

J. Sellers Barnes

5 00

Mrs. E. Franklin Garrett

1 00

S. J. Eastman

3 00

C. A. Helme

5 00

W. F. Schwartz

2 00

Mrs. J. Lowber Welsh

5 00

FORM OF BEQUEST OF PERSONAL PROPERTY.

I give and bequeath to “THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY” the sum of ____ Dollars.

FORM OF DEVISE OF REAL ESTATE.

I give and devise to “THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY” all that certain piece or parcel of land. (Here describe the property.)

ARTICLE V.

The Acting Committee shall consist of officers of the Society, ex officio, and fifty other members. They shall visit the prison at least twice a month, inquire into the circumstances of the prisoners and report such abuses as they shall discover to the proper officers appointed to remedy them. They shall examine the influence of confinement on the morals of the prisoners. They shall keep regular minutes of their proceedings, which shall be submitted at every stated meeting of the Society; and shall be authorized to fill vacancies, occurring in their own body, whether arising from death or removal from the city, or from inability or neglect to visit the prisons in accordance with their regulations. They shall also have the sole power of electing new members.

ARTICLE VI.

Candidates for membership may be proposed at any meeting of the Society or of the Acting Committee; but no election shall take place within ten days after such nomination. Each member shall pay an annual contribution of two dollars. If any member neglects or refuses to pay such contribution within three months, after due notice has been given such person, the Acting Committee may, at its option, strike said name from the list of members. The payment of twenty dollars at any one time shall constitute a Life Membership. Any person paying not less than five hundred dollars shall be called a Patron of the Society.

ARTICLE VII.

Honorary members may be elected at such times as the Society may deem expedient.

ARTICLE VIII.

The Society shall hold an Annual Meeting on the fourth Fifth-day (Thursday) in the First month (January) of each year, and Stated Meetings on the fourth Fifth-day (Thursday) in the months of April, July and October; at which seven shall constitute a quorum.

ARTICLE IX.

No alteration in the Constitution shall be made, unless the same shall have been proposed at a Stated Meeting of the Society, held not less than three months previous to the adoption of such alteration; and no such amendment shall be adopted unless approved by the votes of three-fourths of the members present.

The Secretary shall state on the notices of that meeting that an amendment or amendments to the Constitution will be acted upon. All other questions shall be decided, when there is a division, by a majority of votes; in those where the Society is equally divided, the presiding officer shall have the casting vote.

OF VISITORS.

No person who is not an official visitor of the prison, or who has not a written permission, according to such rules as the Inspectors may adopt as aforesaid, shall be allowed to visit the same; the official visitors are: the Governor; the Speaker and members of the Senate; the Speaker and members of the House of Representatives; the Secretary of the Commonwealth; the Judges of the Supreme Court; the Attorney-General and his Deputies; the President and Associate Judges of all the courts in the State; the Mayor and Recorders of the cities of Philadelphia, Lancaster, and Pittsburg; Commissioners and Sheriffs of the several Counties; and the “Acting Committee of the Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons.” (Note: Now named The Pennsylvania Prison Society.)

AN ACT TO INCORPORATE THE Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons.

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in General Assembly met, and it is hereby enacted by the authority of the same, That all and every the persons who shall at the time of the passing of this Act, be members of the Society called “The Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons,” shall be and they are hereby created and declared to be one body, politic and corporate, by the name, style, and title of “The Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons,” and by the same name shall have perpetual succession, and shall be able to sue and be sued, implead and be impleaded in all courts of record or elsewhere, and to take and receive, hold and enjoy, by purchase, grant, devise, or bequest to them and their successors, lands, tenements, rents, annuities, franchises, hereditaments, goods, and chattels of whatsoever nature, kind, or quality soever, real, personal or mixed, or choses in action, and the same from time to time to sell, grant, devise, alien, or dispose of; provided, That the clear yearly value or income of the necessary houses, lands, and tenements, rents, annuities, and other hereditaments, and real estate of the said corporation, and the interest of money by it lent, shall not exceed the sum of five thousand dollars; and also to make and have a common seal, and the same to break, alter, and renew at pleasure; and also to ordain, establish and put in execution, such by-laws, ordinances, and regulations as shall appear necessary and convenient for the government of the said corporation, not being contrary to this Charter or the Constitution and laws of the United States, or of this Commonwealth, and generally to do all and singular the matters and things which to them it shall lawfully appertain to do for the well-being of the said corporation, and the due management and ordering of the affairs thereof; and provided further, that the object of the Society shall be confined to the alleviation of the miseries of public prisons, the improvement of prison discipline, and the relief of discharged prisoners.

SAM’L ANDERSON, Speaker of House.

THOS. RINGLAND, Speaker of Senate.

Approved the 6th day of April, Anno Domini Eighteen Hundred and Thirty-three.

GEORGE WOLF.

LEGAL CHANGE OF NAME.

The Following Confirms the Action Relative to the Change of the Name of the Prison Society.

Decree:

And now, to wit, this 27th day of January, A. D., 1886, on motion of A. Sidney Biddle, Esq., the Petition and Application for change of name filed by “The Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons,” having been presented and considered, and it appearing that the order of court heretofore made as to advertisement has been duly compiled with and due notice of said application to the Auditor General of the State of Pennsylvania being shown, it is Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed that the name of the said Society shall hereafter be “THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY,” to all intents and purposes as if the same had been the original name of the said Society, and the same name shall be deemed and taken to be a part of the Charter of the said Society upon the recording of the said Application with its indorsements and this Decree in the office of the Recorder of Deeds of this County, and upon filing with the Auditor General a Copy of this Decree.

[Signed] JOSEPH ALLISON,

Record:

Recorded in the office for the Recording of Deeds in and for the City and County of Philadelphia, on Charter Book No. 11, page 1064. Witness my hand and seal of Office this 28th day of June, A. D. 1886.

GEO. G. PIERIE, Recorder of Deeds.

Transcriber’s Note:

Obvious printer errors corrected silently.

Inconsistent spelling and hyphenation are as in the original.

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE JOURNAL OF PRISON DISCIPLINE AND PHILANTHROPY (NEW SERIES, NO. 40, JANUARY 1901) ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:

- • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”

- • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

- • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.

- • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

Table of Contents

New Series Number 40 THE JOURNAL OF PRISON DISCIPLINE AND PHILANTHROPY PUBLISHED ANNUALLY UNDER THE DIRECTION OF “THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY.” INSTITUTED MAY 8th, 1787. JANUARY, 1901. OFFICE: STATE HOUSE ROW S. W. Corner Fifth and Chestnut Streets PHILADELPHIA, PA.

CONSTITUTION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY.

ARTICLE I.

ARTICLE II.

ARTICLE III.

ARTICLE IV.

New Series Number 40 THE JOURNAL OF PRISON DISCIPLINE AND PHILANTHROPY PUBLISHED ANNUALLY UNDER THE DIRECTION OF “THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY.” INSTITUTED MAY 8TH, 1787. JANUARY, 1901. OFFICE: STATE HOUSE ROW S. W. Corner Fifth and Chestnut Streets PHILADELPHIA, PA. THE Pennsylvania Prison Society

OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY FOR 1901.

COMMITTEES OF THE SOCIETY FOR 1901.

STANDING COMMITTEES.

TABLE OF CONTENTS.

JOURNAL OF PRISON DISCIPLINE

ONE HUNDRED AND FOURTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT 1787. OF 1901. “THE PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY.”

TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT OF JOHN J. LYTLE, GENERAL SECRETARY.

CORRESPONDENCE.

WORK OF THE SOCIETY AND ITS ACTING COMMITTEE.

THE EASTERN STATE PENITENTIARY.

SOME CASES OF INTEREST WHICH HAVE COME TO OUR NOTICE.

THE OFFICERS.

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON AND ANNEX.

CHESTER COUNTY PRISON.

DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON.

OTHER COUNTY PRISONS.

POLICE MATRONS.

In Memoriam.

GATHERED FROM REPORTS AND OTHER SOURCES.

STATE PRISON DILEMMA.

HOW TO DEAL WITH WICKED MEN.

WHERE DEATH PENALTY IS NEEDED.

THE LOCK-STEP.

GRADING AND CLASSIFYING OF PRISONERS.

RECLAIMED CRIMINALS BY PAROLE LAWS.

PROPOSED MARRIAGE REFORM.

CONTRACT, PRICE-PIECE, STATE ACCOUNT.

CONVICT LABOR ON STATE FARMS.

ROAD MAKING FOR CONVICTS.

INDUSTRIAL REFORMATORIES.

MASSACHUSETTS STATE REFORMATORY, CONCORD.

ILLINOIS REFORMATORY, PONTIAC.

THE JUVENILE COURT OF CHICAGO.

SLOYD WORK.

NOVEL PUNISHMENT.

THE WHIPPING-POST.

THE BERTILLON SYSTEM.

RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF THE INSANE.

HAVANA PRISONS, CUBA.

AUSTRALIAN PRISON REFORM.

PRISONS IN OLD PARIS.

MODEL FRENCH PRISON.

SIBERIAN BANISHMENT.

NORWAY PRISON.

THE NATIONAL PRISON CONGRESS.

GOV. GEORGE K. NASH, ADDRESS OF WELCOME.

HON. FREDERICK HOWARD WINES, LL.D.,

ADDRESS.

GRADES OF PRISONS.

EDUCATION.

PRISON LABOR

BERTILLON SYSTEM OF IDENTIFICATION.

SUNDAY MORNING, SEPTEMBER 23d.

Monday, 9 A. M., September 24th.

PRESIDENT’S ANNUAL ADDRESS, ALBERT GARVIN,

ADDRESS BY H. F. HATCH, IONA, MICH.

JOSEPH F. SCOTT, WARDEN MASSACHUSETTS STATE REFORMATORY,

MONDAY AFTERNOON.

ADDRESS. REV. WM. J. BATT, CHAPLAIN, CONCORD, MASS.

CHAPLAIN WM. A. LOCKE, MANSFIELD, OHIO, READ A PAPER ON

PRACTICAL PRISON REFORM.

MONDAY, EVENING, SEPTEMBER 24TH.

ADDRESS—HON. C. V. COLLINS, SUPT. N. Y. STATE PRISONS.

ADDRESS.

SCIENTIFIC CRIMINAL STUDY.

TUESDAY MORNING, SEPTEMBER 24TH.

REPORT ON “PREVENTATIVE AND REFORMATORY WORK,” GEORGE TORRANCE, PONTIAC, ILL., SUPERINTENDENT STATE REFORMATORY.

FOUNDED ON FACTS.

THE PAROLE LAWS.

H. E. ALLISON, M. D., STATE HOSPITAL FOR CRIMINAL INSANE, MATTAWAN, N. Y., FISHKILL-ON-HUDSON,

T. J. CHARLTON, SUPT. REFORMATORY SCHOOL FOR BOYS, PLAINFIELD, INDIANA,

CAPTAIN C. S. TREMBY, U. S. N.,

MRS. FRANCES A. MORTON, SUPT. REFORMATORY FOR WOMEN, SOUTH FARMINGTON, MASS.,

ADDRESS.

NEXT CONGRESS MEETING PLACE.

ENTERTAINMENT OF THE CONGRESS.

TUESDAY EVENING.

JOSÉ F. GODOY, FIRST SECRETARY OF THE MEXICAN EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, D. C.,

ADDRESS, HON. EUGENE SMITH, NEW YORK CITY.

SOME STARTLING FIGURES.

THE AVERAGE STEAL.

JOSEPH F. SCOTT, SUPERINTENDENT MASSACHUSETTS REFORMATORY,

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26TH, A. M.—CHAPLAINS’ MEETING.

J. WARREN MEADE, WARDEN AUBURN STATE PRISON, N. Y.,

MEMORIAL TRIBUTE

C. P. HOYT, WARDEN, BUENA, COLORADO,

J. WARREN BAILY, MASSACHUSETTS,

OREN C. PAINTER, OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND,

AMOS W. BUTLER, IND., SEC’TY BOARD STATE CHARITIES,

CONNECTICUT REQUIRES

WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON, CLOSING SESSION.

COMPLIMENTARY RESOLUTIONS TO

TREASURER’S REPORT.

DONATIONS RECEIVED

FORM OF DEVISE OF REAL ESTATE.

ARTICLE V.

ARTICLE VI.

ARTICLE VII.

ARTICLE VIII.

ARTICLE IX.

OF VISITORS.

AN ACT TO INCORPORATE THE Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons.

LEGAL CHANGE OF NAME.

The Following Confirms the Action Relative to the Change of the Name of the Prison Society.

Decree:

Record:

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE